Cited by 79Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The assessment of telemedicine to support outpatient palliative care in advanced cancer

Hennemann-Krause, Lilian, Lopes, Agnaldo José, Araújo, Janete Alves, Petersen, Elisabeth Martins, Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú·2015·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to examine telemedicine as a form of home and additional support for traditional outpatient care as a way to remotely monitor and manage the symptoms of patients with advanced cancer. Method: In total, 12 patients were monitored through monthly consultations with a multidisciplinary healthcare team and weekly web conferences. To evaluate and treat pain and other symptoms, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was applied during all remote or in-person interviews. Results: During monitoring, the team contacted the patients on 305 occasions: there were 89 consultations at the hospital, 19 in-person assistances to the family (without the patient), 77 web conferences, 38 telephone calls, 80 emails, and 2 home visits. The mean monitoring time until death was 195 ± 175.1 days. Eight patients who completed the ESAS in all interviews had lower mean distress symptom scores according to web conferences than in person. Significance of results: Telemedicine allowed greater access to the healthcare system, reduced the need to employ emergency services, improved assessment/control of symptoms, and provided greater orientation and confidence in the care given by family members through early and proactive interventions. Web conferencing proved to be a good adjuvant to home monitoring of symptoms, complementing in-person assistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s147895151400100x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hennemann-Krause, L., Lopes, A. J., Araújo, J. A., Petersen, E. M., & Nunes, R. A.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Lopes, Agnaldo José
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2014-08-27
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
1025-1030
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2161320723
Cited by
79
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
telemedicine, outpatient palliative care, advanced cancer, symptom monitoring, web conferencing, home monitoring, pain management, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, multidisciplinary healthcare teams, family caregiver support, health care access
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Palliative Care, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review