Availability as key determinant in the palliative home care setting from the patients’ and family caregivers’ perspectives: A quantitative-qualitative-content analysis approach
Abstract
Objective: A sense of security is important in palliative home care. Yet, knowledge about which components contribute most to feeling secure from the patients’ and family caregivers’ perspectives, especially since the introduction of specialist palliative home care, is sparse. The goal of the current study was to determine the key components contributing to a sense of security and how they relate to each other as experienced by patients and family caregivers in specialist and generalist palliative home care. Methods: The current sub-study, as part of a larger study, was performed in different regions in Germany. Palliative care patients and family caregivers of at least 18 years of age, being cared for at home were interviewed using semi-structured interview guides following a three-factor model and analyzed by using a combined quantitative-qualitative-content approach. Results: One hundred and ninty-seven patients and 10 carers completed interviews between December 2017 and April 2019. The majority of patients were diagnosed with an oncological disease. Sense of security was mentioned particularly often suggesting its high relevance. We identified nine subcategories that were all mentioned more frequently by specialist than generalist palliative home care recipients in the following order of priority and relation: (i) patient-centeredness: availability, provision of information/education, professional competence, patient empowerment, and trust (ii) organizational work: comprehensive responsibility, external collaboration, and internal cooperation, and (iii) direct communication. Significance of results: The work of specialist palliative home care services in particular was perceived as very effective and beneficial. Our findings confirm a previously developed three-factor model allowing for generalizability and revealed that availability was most important for improving the sense of security for effective palliative home care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Establishing effective communication mechanisms and collaborative relationships is important.
“Dillen et al. [39] emphasise the importance of establishing effective communication mechanisms and collaborative relationships.”
From Experiences of family caregivers of patients with end-of-life cancer during the transition from hospital to home palliative care: a qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 · Cited by 12,033 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This allowed for an in-depth understanding of their experiences beyond saturation (Saunders et al., 2018).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xu, Y., Liu, Y., Kang, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, Y., Wu, L., & Yuan, L. (2024) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01559-4 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Dil-len et al. [39] emphasise the importance of establishing effective communication mechanisms and collaborative relationships.”
Background
- Authors
- Dillen, K., Joshi, M., Krumm, N., Hesse, M., Brunsch, H., Schmidt, H., Strupp, J., Radbruch, L., Rolke, R., & Voltz, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cologne (DE)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- University Hospital Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dillen, Kim
- ORCID
- Venue
- Palliative and Supportive Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-12-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-579
- ISSN
- 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-9523
- OpenAlex
- W3112953221
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- home-based palliative care, sense of security, availability, patient-centeredness, family caregivers, patient empowerment, trust, professional competence, information provision, organizational work, direct communication, cancer patients
- MeSH terms
- Home Care Services, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Caregivers, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review