Cited by 20Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Family caregiver grief and post-loss adjustment: A longitudinal cohort study

Coelho, Alexandra, Roberto, Magda, Barros, Luísa, Barbosa, António·2022·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective In order to better understand the different grieving trajectories of the family caregivers (FCs), this study aims to examine the evolution of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) symptoms and the predictive role of the caregiving-related factors in the FCs' grieving trajectory from pre- to post-death. Method A prospective cohort study was carried out with advanced cancer FCs evaluated before death (T1) and 6-12 months post-loss (T2). Results Participants in T1 ( n = 156) were mostly female, adult child, or spouse of the care recipient, with a mean age of 51.78 (SD = 13.29). At T2, 87 FCs participated in the survey. PGD prevalence was higher pre-death (38.6%) than in bereavement (33.7%). Of those who met the PGD criteria before death, most also met these criteria after death ( n = 26, 61.9%). Psychological distress and caregiver burden were highly correlated with pre-death grief, which in turn played a critical role in mediating the link between psychological distress and bereavement outcome. Great emotional closeness in the relationship was predictive of PGD symptoms persistence. In contrast, the long-term consequences of caregiver burden were not confirmed. Significance of results This study provides evidence for the diversity of individual FC responses and the complex pattern of interactions between caregiving-related factors, relationship quality, and PGD symptoms evolution from pre- to post-death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s147895152100095x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coelho, A., Roberto, M., Barros, L., & Barbosa, A.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Coelho, Alexandra
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
348-356
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W3174033586
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
family caregivers, prolonged grief disorder, bereavement, grief trajectories, advanced cancer, caregiver burden, psychological distress, emotional closeness, relationship quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Female, Grief, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review