Applying the Lean principles of the Toyota Production System to reduce wait times in the emergency department
Open accessAbstract
Objective: In recognition of patient wait times, and deteriorating patient and staff satisfaction, we set out to improve these measures in our emergency department (ED) without adding any new funding or beds. Methods: In 2005 all staff in the ED at Hôtel-Dieu Grace Hospital began a transformation, employing Toyota Lean manufacturing principles to improve ED wait times and quality of care. Lean techniques such as value-stream mapping, just-in-time delivery techniques, workplace organization, reduction of systemic wastes, use of the worker as the source of quality improvement and ongoing refinement of our process steps formed the basis of our project. Results: Our ED has achieved major improvements in departmental flow without adding any additional ED or inpatient beds. The mean registration to physician time has decreased from 111 minutes to 78 minutes. The number of patients who left without being seen has decreased from 7.1% to 4.3%. The length of stay (LOS) for discharged patients has decreased from a mean of 3.6 to 2.8 hours, with the largest decrease seen in our patients triaged at levels 4 or 5 using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. We noted an improvement in ED patient satisfaction scores following the implementation of Lean principles. Conclusion: Lean manufacturing principles can improve the flow of patients through the ED, resulting in greater patient satisfaction along with reduced time spent by the patient in the ED.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lean implementation in reviewed emergency departments was associated with increased patient satisfaction.
“Increased patient satisfaction [ 73 ] [ 75 ] [ 81 ] [ 83 ] [ 85 ]”
From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lean Thinking-Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation.
Rand, G. K., Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/3010314 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Liker, J. Κ. (2003) · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Using industrial processes to improve patient care
Young, T. P., Brailsford, S., Connell, C., Davies, R., Harper, P., & Klein, J. H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7432.162 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Applying Lean Thinking in Hospitals - Exploring Implementation Difficulties
Laursen, M. L., Gertsen, F., & Johansen, J. (2003) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Can car manufacturing techniques reform health care?
McCarthy, M. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68053-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Improving emergency department flow. Eliminating ED inefficiencies reduces patient wait times.
Karpiel, M. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Health care quality improvement in the emergency department: a reengineering approach.
Schaming, J. S., & Gulati, A. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500012021 Published online by Cambridge University Press CJEM • JCMU 2010; 12 (1) 57 Lean principles to reduce wait times in the ED
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review
Holden, R. J. (2011) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ng, D., Vail, G., Thomas, S., & Schmidt, N.
- Affiliations
- Hôtel-Dieu Grace Healthcare (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ng, David
- Venue
- CJEM
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 50-57
- ISSN
- 1481-8035 (ISSN-L)
- 1481-8043
- OpenAlex
- W2148952715
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- lean manufacturing, Toyota Production System, emergency department waiting times, patient flow, value stream mapping, just-in-time delivery, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, patient abandonment, emergency department triage, waste reduction
- MeSH terms
- Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Length of Stay, Ontario, Patient Admission, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Triage, Waiting Lists, Patient Satisfaction, Process Assessment, Health Care, Efficiency, Organizational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review