Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions
Abstract
The article develops an approach to the study of modular political phenomena (action based in significant part on emulation of the prior successful example of others), focusing on the trade-offs between the influence of example, structural facilitation, and institutional constraints. The approach is illustrated through the example of the spread of democratic revolution in the post-communist region during the 2000–2006 period, with significant comparisons to the diffusion of separatist nationalism in the Soviet Union during the glasnost' era.Mark R. Beissinger is Professor of Politics, Princeton University (mbeissin@princeton.edu). The author is grateful to the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison for the opportunity to pursue research for this essay. He would also like to thank Nancy Bermeo, Valerie Bunce, Atul Kohli, Jon Pevehouse, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Edward Schatz, Jack Snyder, Al Stepan, Joshua Tucker, and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback on an earlier version of this article.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Revolutionary waves become less successful the further away they travel from their original point of instigation.
“Oftentimes, revolutionary waves become less successful the further away they travel from their original point of instigation (Beissinger 2007; Patel, Bunce, and Wolchik 2011).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Beissinger 2007
Cites
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408 · see citing works
What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?
Geddes, B. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115 · Cited by 2,025 · see citing works
Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution
Kuran, T. (1989) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/bf00116762 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory
Goldstone, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Arab Spring: Why the Surprising Similarities with the Revolutionary Wave of 1848?
Weyland, K. (2012) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592712002873 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory
Lawson, G. (2016) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275116649221 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Democracy’s backsliding in the international environment
Hyde, S. D. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2434 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
What do we know about civil society and regime change thirty years after 1989?
Bernhard, M. (2020) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787160 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beissinger, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beissinger, Mark R.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-14
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 02
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2018298021
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 59.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
- Keywords
- institutional constraints, democratic revolution, post-communist democratization, glasnost, Soviet Union, Tulip Revolution, Orange Revolution, Rose Revolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review