The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order
Abstract
Liberal international order—both its ideas and real-world political formations—is not embodied in a fixed set of principles or practices. Open markets, international institutions, cooperative security, democratic community, progressive change, collective problem solving, the rule of law—these are aspects of the liberal vision that have made appearances in various combinations and changing ways over the last century. I argue that it is possible to identify three versions or models of liberal international order—versions 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0. The first is associated with the ideas of Woodrow Wilson, the second is the Cold War liberal internationalism of the post-1945 decades, and the third version is a sort of post-hegemonic liberal internationalism that has only partially appeared and whose full shape and logic is still uncertain. I develop a set of dimensions that allow for identifying different logics of liberal international order and identify variables that will shape the movement from liberal internationalism 2.0 to 3.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
War and Change in World Politics
Gilpin, R. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664267 · Cited by 4,020
After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy
Diebold, W., & Keohane, R. O. (1984) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20042201 · Cited by 3,944
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics
Moravcsik, A. (1997) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081897550447 · Cited by 2,814
Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy
Krasner, S. D. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400823260 · Cited by 2,477
(2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1057/9781137356734.0006 · Cited by 2,016
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396337308441409 · Cited by 1,918
After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy
Buzan, B. (1985) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2617490 · Cited by 1,800
Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0575 · Cited by 1,727
Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics
GRANT, R. W., & KEOHANE, R. O. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051476 · Cited by 1,620
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400823963 · Cited by 1,461
Self-citation
Cited by
The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
The Impact of China on Cybersecurity: Fiction and Friction
Lindsay, J. R. (2015) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00189 · Cited by 183
A novel pathway to power? Contestation and adaptation in China's internationalization of the RMB
McNally, C. A., & Gruin, J. (2017) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1319400 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikenberry, G. J.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-02-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-87
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2165371879
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 59.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1537592709090112
- The paper
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592709090112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.