The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet
Abstract
What is the impact of the possibility of political participation on the Internet on long-standing patterns of participatory inequality in American politics? An August 2008 representative survey of Americans conducted by the Pew Internet and American Life Project provides little evidence that there has been any change in the extent to which political participation is stratified by socio-economic status, but it suggests that the web has ameliorated the well-known participatory deficit among those who have just joined the electorate. Even when only that subset of the population with Internet access is considered, participatory acts such as contributing to candidates, contacting officials, signing a political petition, or communicating with political groups are as stratified socio-economically when done on the web as when done offline. The story is different for stratification by age where historically younger people have been less engaged than older people in most forms of political participation. Young adults are much more likely than their elders to be comfortable with electronic technologies and to use the Internet, but among Internet users, the young are not especially politically active. How these trends play out in the future depends on what happens to the current Web-savvy younger generation and the cohorts that follow and on the rapidly developing political capacities of the Web. Stay logged on …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L., & BRADY, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,626
Self-citationVoice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3597 · Cited by 5,186
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
Benkler, Y. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,680
Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,590
Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1165 · Cited by 2,937
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Hindman, M. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837496 · Cited by 1,680
Prior, M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139878425 · Cited by 1,582
The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom
Given, J. (2007) · Information Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.03.001 · Cited by 1,387
Education and democratic citizenship in America
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4140 · Cited by 1,253
Cited by
Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.871318 · Cited by 473
Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381613000431 · Cited by 401
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS IN INTERNET TIME
Karpf, D. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.665468 · Cited by 285
Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000323 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 487-509
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2148299999
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 75.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1537592710001210
- The paper
- Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592710001210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.