Cited by 387Social Media and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and Politics

The Consequences of the Internet for Politics

Farrell, Henry·2012·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

Political scientists are only now beginning to come to terms with the importance of the Internet to politics. The most promising way to study the Internet is to look at the role that causal mechanisms such as the lowering of transaction costs, homophilous sorting, and preference falsification play in intermediating between specific aspects of the Internet and political outcomes. This will allow scholars to disentangle the relevant causal relationships and contribute to important present debates over whether the Internet exacerbates polarization in the United States, and whether social media helped pave the way toward the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. Over time, ever fewer political scientists are likely to study the Internet as such, as it becomes more and more a part of everyday political life. However, integrating the Internet's effects with present debates over politics, and taking proper advantage of the extraordinary data that it can provide, requires good causal arguments and attention to their underlying mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views.

    “A recurring theme in the literature on the Internet and politics is how the increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views (Farrell 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrell, H.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Farrell, Henry
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2012-06-15
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
35-52
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2160208583
Cited by
387
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 4
FWCI
40.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
internet and politics, social media, transaction costs, homophily, preference falsification, political polarization, Arab Spring, causal mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review