The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements
Abstract
Why do two cognate literatures—social movements and electoral studies—travel along parallel paths with little conversation between them? And what can be done to connect them in the future? Drawing on their work with the late Charles Tilly on Dynamics of Contention(2001), Doug McAdam and Sidney Tarrow examine two important studies that approach (but do not effect such a linkage), propose a mechanism-based set of linkages between elections and social movements, and apply their approach in a preliminary examination of the relations between the American anti-war movement after 9/11 and the Democratic Party.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Self-citationThe Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963) · Cited by 4,055
From Mobilization to Revolution
Tilly, C. (2017) · Collective Violence, Contentious Politics, and Social Change · doi:10.4324/9781315205021-5 · Cited by 3,999
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462 · Cited by 3,314
Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970
McAdam, D. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226555553.001.0001 · Cited by 3,168
Self-citationThe Logic of Violence in Civil War
(2006) · The Logic of Violence in Civil War · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462.001 · Cited by 2,402
The New Transnational Activism
Tarrow, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791055 · Cited by 2,383
Self-citationNuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences
Elster, J. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812255 · Cited by 2,017
Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300555042 · Cited by 1,939
Cited by
Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L., & Luke, R. E. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316 · Cited by 220
Patterson, J. J. (2023) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00684 · Cited by 140
Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105
The ‘ballot and the brick’: Protest, voting and non-voting in post-apartheid South Africa
Runciman, C. (2016) · Journal of Contemporary African Studies · doi:10.1080/02589001.2017.1287347 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 529-542
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2108370948
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 46.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1537592710001234
- The paper
- McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592710001234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.