The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State
Abstract
President Barack Obama's two signature first-term legislative victories—the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank Act—are the law of the land, but the political battle over their entrenchment continues. The question now is whether these landmark reforms will be consolidated and create a new politics going forward. We develop an argument about the limits of policy feedback to illuminate the obstacles to durable liberal reform in the contemporary American state. We argue that political scientists have paid insufficient attention to the fragility of inherited policy commitments, and that the capacity of reforms to remake politics is contingent, conditional, and contested. Feedbacks are shaped not only by the internal attributes of policies, but also by the interaction between policy-specific characteristics, the strategic goals of officeholders and clientele groups, and the political forces arising from a contentious and uncertain political environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agendas and instability in American politics
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0574 · Cited by 5,981
Congress, The Electoral Connection
Ross, M. J., & Mayhew, D. R. (1975) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/447379 · Cited by 4,094
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,130
When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change
Pierson, P. (1993) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2950710 · Cited by 2,600
Thelen, K. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790997 · Cited by 2,477
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States
Skocpol, T. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674043725 · Cited by 2,439
Theories Of The Policy Process
Weible, C. M. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003308201 · Cited by 2,291
Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 · Cited by 2,081
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States.
Kessler-Harris, A., & Skocpol, T. (1993) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2080420 · Cited by 1,954
The logic of congressional action
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4778 · Cited by 1,813
Cited by
Policy Feedback and the Politics of Administration
Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12200 · Cited by 265
Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward
Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12340 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1071-1087
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W1982469483
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 49.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1537592713002831
- The paper
- Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E. (2013). The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592713002831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.