Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward
Abstract
Policy feedback refers to the variety of ways in which existing policies can shape key aspects of politics and policymaking. Originating in historical institutionalism, the study of policy feedback has expanded to address resource and interpretative effects on target populations and mass publics, the roles of policy elites, and how feedback effects are conditioned by policy designs and larger institutional contexts. Recently, more attention has also been paid to feedback effects that are not self‐reinforcing in nature. This introduction provides a nonexhaustive review of the existing historical institutionalist literature on policy feedback as well as introducing the contributions to the special issue. The diversity of policy feedback scholarship is reflected in manuscripts building from the social constructions framework and the thermostatic model. Advances in research are captured in contributions empirically testing different forms of feedback, varied strategies of policy elites to shape feedback, and how context may suppress feedback effects. The special issue emphasizes critical, understudied dimensions shaping feedback processes, such as race, and the role of organizations. A major lacuna in policy feedback scholarship, the overwhelming emphasis on the United States, must be addressed through more comparative and international research including closer dialogs between U.S.‐based and non‐U.S. scholars.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · see citing works
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092 · see citing works
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
HACKER, J. S. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001121 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action
Soss, J. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585401 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2007) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226075952.001.0001 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Béland, D., Marchildon, G. P., Medrano, A., & Rocco, P. (2024) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12575 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Béland, D., & Schlager, E.
- Venue
- Policy Studies Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-29
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-205
- ISSN
- 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0072
- OpenAlex
- W2943245787
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 106.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policy Studies Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- policy feedback, historical institutionalism, social constructionism, policy elites, policy design, institutional environment, race, organizations, comparative policy analysis, policy making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review