Cited by 778Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesFeminism, Gender, and IntersectionalityGender and Feminist Studies

INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies

Bilge, Sirma·2013·Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Abstract

This article identifies a set of power relations within contemporary feminist academic debates on intersectionality that work to “depoliticizing intersectionality,” neutralizing the critical potential of intersectionality for social justice-oriented change. At a time when intersectionality has received unprecedented international acclaim within feminist academic circles, a specifically disciplinary academic feminism in tune with the neoliberal knowledge economy engages in argumentative practices that reframe and undermine it. This article analyzes several specific trends in debate that neutralize the political potential of intersectionality, such as confining intersectionality to an academic exercise of metatheoretical contemplation, as well as “whitening intersectionality” through claims that intersectionality is “the brainchild of feminism” and requires a reformulated “broader genealogy of intersectionality.”

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742058x13000283

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilge, S.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Bilge, Sirma
Venue
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
Published
2013
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
405-424
ISSN
  • 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-0598
OpenAlex
W2587890271
Cited by
778
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7
FWCI
33.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
intersectionality, depoliticization, academic feminism, power relations, social justice, whiteness, feminist theory, metatheory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review