The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality
Open accessAbstract
Conservation agriculture (CA) systems are based upon minimal soil disturbance; crop residue retention and crop rotation and/or intercrop association are increasingly seen to recycle nutrients, increase yield and reduce production costs. This study examines the effects of CA practices on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality under the conditions encountered by smallholder farmers in two farming communities from 2005 to 2011 in Malawi, as part of the contribution to remedy a lack of supporting agronomic research for these relatively new systems. The drier agroenvironment of Lemu of Bazale Extension Planning Area (EPA) is characterized by sandy clay loam soils and lower rainfall. Here, CA showed positive benefits on maize yield after the first season of experimentation, with highest increases of 2.7 Mg ha−1 and 2.3 Mg ha−1 more yield in CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop, respectively, than the conventional tillage in the driest season of 2009/10. In the high rainfall environment of Zidyana EPA (characterized by sandy loam soils), substantial maize yield benefits resulted in the fifth season of experimentation. Farmers spent at most 50 days ha−1(US$140) producing maize under CA systems compared with 62 days ha−1(US$176) spent under conventional tillage practices. In Lemu, both CA systems resulted in gross margins three times higher than that of the conventional control plot, while in Zidyana, CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop resulted in 33 and 23% higher gross margins, respectively, than conventional tillage. In Zidyana, the earthworm population was highest (48 earthworms m−2 in the first 30 cm) in CA monocrop maize, followed by a CA maize–legume intercropping (40 earthworms) and lowest (nine earthworms) in conventionally tilled treatment. In both study locations CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop gave higher water infiltration than the conventional treatment. Improvements in crop productivity, overall economic gain and soil quality have made CA an attractive system for farmers in Malawi and other areas with similar conditions. However, for extensive adoption of CA by smallholder farmers, cultural beliefs that crop production is possible without the ubiquitous ridge and furrow system and residue burning for mice hunting have to be overcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa : the heretics ’ view
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 · Cited by 1,499
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations
Montgomery, D. R. (2007) · doi:10.1525/9780520933163 · Cited by 406
McGarry, D., Bridge, B. J., & Radford, B. J. (2000) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(99)00091-4 · Cited by 209
Gowing, J. W., & Palmer, M. (2008) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00137.x · Cited by 161
Cited by
Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2292 · Cited by 901
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Thierfelder, C., White, R. P., & Jat, M. L. (2016) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.005 · Cited by 444
Self-citationAbegunde, V. O., Sibanda, M., & Obi, A. (2019) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli7110132 · Cited by 293
The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers
Pannell, D. J., Llewellyn, R. S., & Corbeels, M. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.014 · Cited by 278
Adoption by adaptation: moving from Conservation Agriculture to conservation practices
Rodenburg, J., Büchi, L., & Haggar, J. (2021) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2020.1785734 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Ngwira, A. R., Thierfelder, C., & Lambert, D. M.
- Venue
- Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 350-363
- ISSN
- 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-1705
- 1742-1713
- OpenAlex
- W2129783393
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1742170512000257
- The paper
- Ngwira, A. R., Thierfelder, C., & Lambert, D. M. (2013). Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170512000257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.