Cited by 8Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Testing and Assessment

The checklist of unit behaviors (CUB): Psychometric properties of a measure of patient milieu engagement on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit

Hanson, Bjorn, Hoxha, Denada, Roberts, Patricia, Gollan, Jackie K.·2013·Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care

Abstract

Abstract Objective This paper presents the psychometric properties, including factor structure, internal reliability and relative validity of a 16-item questionnaire measuring patients’ relative activation with milieu activities while hospitalised in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit. Method 24 hours after admission, and before discharge, psychiatric inpatients (N = 132) completed a set of validated self-reports and the pilot questionnaire, the Checklist of Unit Behaviors (CUB). The CUB outlines items that reflect the extent to which the patient avoided or engaged with the treatment milieu within the previous 24 hours. Factor analysis, bivariate correlations and repeated-measures t-tests were used to analyse the data. Results Factor analysis identified two factors for the CUB: (1) Behavioural Approach; and (2) Behavioural Avoidance. Psychometric properties were satisfactory (Approach, Cronbach's α = 0.93; Avoidance, Cronbach's α = 0.79). Over the course of treatment, CUB-Approach increased (p < 0.001) and CUB-Avoidance decreased (p < 0.001). The construct validity of the CUB was supported through correlations with measures of positive and negative affect. Conclusions The CUB demonstrates strong psychometric properties, quantifying patients’ behavioural activation in the treatment milieu. Daily use of the CUB provides clinically useful information that has the potential to improve patient care and treatment planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742646412000349

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanson, B., Hoxha, D., Roberts, P., & Gollan, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Gollan, Jackie K.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
101-109
ISSN
  • 1742-6464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-2206
OpenAlex
W2009289978
Cited by
8
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
behavioral activation, avoidance behavior, acute psychiatric inpatient unit, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, positive and negative affect, self-report questionnaire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review