Engendering Political Science: An Immodest Proposal
Abstract
Since its emergence in the 1970s, feminist scholarship has claimed to be corrective and transformative. Through original research about the experiences of the majority of the world's population, that is, women, feminist scholars have sought to correct omissions and distortions that permeate political science. Through the use of gender as an analytical tool, they have illuminated social and political relations neglected by mainstream accounts, advanced alternative explanations of political phenomena, demonstrated the defects of competing hypotheses, and debunked opposing views. Despite such impressive accomplishments, feminist political science has not become a dominant paradigm within the discipline. Few doctoral programs allow students to develop areas of concentration in feminist approaches to political studies. Few routinely include feminist scholarship in proseminars in American politics, comparative politics, international relations, political theory, public law, or public policy. None requires familiarity with leading feminist scholarship as a criterion of professional competence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The leverage gained from considering gender as a category of analysis stems from the importance of gender in everyday life-the importance of gender structures, symbols, and identities.
“But the leverage gained from considering gender as a category of analysis stems from the importance of gender in everyday life-the importance of gender structures, symbols, and identities (Hawkesworth 2005).”
From The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender (2006) · cites this paper as Hawkesworth 2005
Cites
From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions
Acker, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075528 · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective
Young, I. M. (1994) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494918 · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender
Weldon, S. L. (2006) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x06231040 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hawkesworth, M.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hawkesworth, Mary
- ORCID
- Hawkesworth, Mary
- Venue
- Politics & Gender
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 01
- ISSN
- 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2156711696
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- feminist political science, feminist scholarship, disciplinary change, feminist pedagogy, curriculum reform, doctoral programs, women in political science, gender and politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review