Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective
Abstract
In the United States, research suggests that men and women candidates are covered differently by the press. However, few studies compare press coverage of candidates cross-nationally. Systematic comparison of newspaper coverage of male and female candidates during election campaigns in Australia, Canada, and the United States may help illuminate the conditions that exacerbate or dampen gender differences in candidate portrayals. Given the sharp focus on candidates in American campaigns and the relatively lower percentage of women in the Congress, we expect to find the greatest disparities in men's and women's press coverage in the United States. Our findings suggest that across these three democracies, candidates are often portrayed in terms of long-standing gender stereotypes. These gender differences have important implications for voters' perceptions of candidates and may shape widely shared attitudes toward women's role in the political arena.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is growing evidence that systematic variation in coverage among women may go beyond national borders.
“Just as comparative single axis studies have demonstrated that female politicians in the aggregate face gendered bias by the press internationally (Kittilson and Fridkin 2008;Ross 2002), there is growing evidence that systematic variation in coverage among women may go beyond national borders.”
From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Kittilson and Fridkin 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns
Ward, O. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161216673195 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kittilson, M. C., & Fridkin, K.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Politics & Gender
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-392
- ISSN
- 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2106885901
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Keywords
- political campaigns, gender stereotypes, women in politics, media coverage, cross-national comparison, Australia, Canada, United States, women's political representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review