Cited by 136Gender Politics and RepresentationMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender, Feminism, and Media

Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective

Kittilson, Miki Caul, Fridkin, Kim·2008·Politics & Gender

Abstract

In the United States, research suggests that men and women candidates are covered differently by the press. However, few studies compare press coverage of candidates cross-nationally. Systematic comparison of newspaper coverage of male and female candidates during election campaigns in Australia, Canada, and the United States may help illuminate the conditions that exacerbate or dampen gender differences in candidate portrayals. Given the sharp focus on candidates in American campaigns and the relatively lower percentage of women in the Congress, we expect to find the greatest disparities in men's and women's press coverage in the United States. Our findings suggest that across these three democracies, candidates are often portrayed in terms of long-standing gender stereotypes. These gender differences have important implications for voters' perceptions of candidates and may shape widely shared attitudes toward women's role in the political arena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1743923x08000330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing evidence that systematic variation in coverage among women may go beyond national borders.

    “Just as comparative single axis studies have demonstrated that female politicians in the aggregate face gendered bias by the press internationally (Kittilson and Fridkin 2008;Ross 2002), there is growing evidence that systematic variation in coverage among women may go beyond national borders.”

    From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Kittilson and Fridkin 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kittilson, M. C., & Fridkin, K.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Politics & Gender
Published
2008-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
371-392
ISSN
  • 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9248
OpenAlex
W2106885901
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
political campaigns, gender stereotypes, women in politics, media coverage, cross-national comparison, Australia, Canada, United States, women's political representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review