The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Respect and disrespect in international politics: the significance of status recognition
Abstract
In our daily lives few things are as important to us as being treated with respect. Yet in International Relations (IR), we regularly assume that actors follow just their material interests or the social norms appropriate for their identity, without caring if the treatment they get matches their own sense of importance and worth. Drawing mostly on insights from moral philosophy and social psychology this article argues that even in international relations social respect can be a significant goal, both for instrumental reasons and as an end in itself. In fact, as long as we ignore this dimension of international politics we will be unable to fully explain major features, specifically the intensity and duration of many cross-border conflicts. To show the perspectives which systematic research on respect may open for IR, this article presents a theoretical overview of the chief factors that shape the reactions to respectful or disrespectful behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000) · Organizational Identity · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,487
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Theory of International Politics
Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201892 · Cited by 8,506
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,091
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
The End of History and the Last Man
Fukuyama, F. (1992) · Cited by 7,535
Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior.
Tiryakian, E. A., & Goffman, E. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091926 · Cited by 7,500
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,159
Theory of International Politics, by Kenneth N. Waltz
Randle, R. F. (1980) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2149594 · Cited by 6,358
Cited by
Reputation and Status as Motives for War
Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., & Huth, P. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-213421 · Cited by 322
Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach
Duque, M. G. (2018) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqy001 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, R.
- Venue
- International Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-142
- ISSN
- 1752-9719 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-9727
- OpenAlex
- W2018108987
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 155
- FWCI
- 100.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Respect and disrespect in international politics: the significance of status recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1752971910000308
- The paper
- Wolf, R. (2011). Respect and disrespect in international politics: the significance of status recognition. International Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971910000308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.