Cited by 12Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A case series to examine whether people with learning disabilities can learn prerequisite skills for cognitive behavioural therapy

Open access

Abstract

Although cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended for the treatment of a number of mental disorders among the general population, the ability of individuals with learning disabilities (LD) to understand CBT concepts and engage in CBT has been questioned. Aims: To examine whether specific prerequisite skills for CBT can be taught to people with LD using a newly developed training intervention and to investigate the acceptability of the intervention. Method: The study adopted a within-subjects case series research design. Quantitative assessment methods were used to evaluate the CBT skills of six adults with mild to moderate LD pre-intervention, following intervention and at 1-week follow-up. Participants were also asked to provide some qualitative feedback about how they had experienced the intervention. Results: The cognitive mediation skills and the ability of most participants to link activating events to emotions increased following intervention training and this improvement was maintained for four of them at follow-up. The feedback of participants regarding the process and content of the task demands was positive. Conclusions: The findings suggest that people with LD can learn some of the skills considered necessary to participate in CBT, such as cognitive mediation. However, further and more robust research is required to substantiate these findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1754470x1700023x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with learning disabilities have historically been excluded from CBT interventions due to a perceived inability to participate and engage in the cognitive component of therapy.

    “Yet historically, people with learning disabilities have been excluded from CBT interventions due to a perceived inability to participate and engage in the cognitive component of therapy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dunn, 1997, British Picture Vocabulary Scale-II
  2. 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.007 · DOI
  3. Vygotsky, 1978, Mind in Society
  4. 10.1348/014466509X416149 · DOI
  5. 2009, IAPT Learning Disabilities: Positive Practice Guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsimopoulou, I., Kroese, B. S., Unwin, G., Azmi, S., & Jones, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Kroese, Biza Stenfert
Venue
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Published
2018
Volume
11
ISSN
1754-470X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793293875
Cited by
12
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Birmingham
  • Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
learning disabilities, cognitive behavioral therapy, prerequisite skills, cognitive mediation, training program, acceptability, emotional awareness, mental illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review