Cited by 9Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Suicide Prevention (CBT-SP) imagery intervention: a case report

Carey, Marie, Wells, Catherine·2019·The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

Abstract

Very little clinical work or research to date has focused on the prioritization of suicidal imagery intervention in the stabilization of risk. Current Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Suicide Prevention (CBT-SP) does not specifically address suicidal imagery as a priority intervention. This paper prioritizes imagery modification as the central task of therapy with the suicidal client. This is a single subject case review describing specific imagery interventions used to destabilize the comforting component of suicidal images, de-glamourize the suicidal image as a problem-solving method and the reconstruction of new images to offset the emotional grasp of both ‘flash-forward’ violent suicidal images and suicidal ‘daydreaming’ rumination. It is hypothesized that when suicidal images become less emotionally charged, the desire to act upon suicide decreases. Focusing on imagery intervention as a priority aims to stabilize risk in a more clinically specific and targeted way. Rob is a 19-year-old depressed young man with chronic suicidal ideation/images with repeated suicide attempts. All GP referrals are of a crisis nature since the age of 16. He was referred to a CBT clinician with specific training and experience in CBT-SP who proposed the following brief imagery intervention. Socialization to treatment rationale was pivotal at the outset to help facilitate strong therapeutic alliance, ‘buy-in’ to the intended de-glamourization of suicide planning/daydreaming/rumination and the eff…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1754470x19000175

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Case-based studies suggest CBT imagery interventions targeting suicidality may contribute to reframing the emotional meaning of psychological pain, fostering greater self-efficacy.

    “Case-based studies [44] suggest CBT imagery interventions targeting suicidality may contribute to reframing the emotional meaning of psychological pain, fostering greater self-efficacy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carey, M., & Wells, C.
Affiliations
Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
Corresponding author
Carey, Marie
Venue
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Published
2019
Volume
12
ISSN
1754-470X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951974064
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicide attempts, young adults, depression, therapeutic relationship, problem-solving strategies, life planning, telephone support, brief intervention, Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review