The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The continuous expansion of citizen participation: a new taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
The repertoire of political participation in democratic societies is expanding rapidly and covers such different activities as voting, demonstrating, volunteering, boycotting, blogging, and flash mobs. Relying on a new method for conceptualizing forms and modes of participation we show that a large variety of creative, expressive, individualized, and digitally enabled forms of participation can be classified as parts of the repertoire of political participation. Results from an innovative survey with a representative sample of the German population demonstrate that old and new forms are systematically integrated into a multi-dimensional taxonomy covering (1) voting, (2) digitally networked participation, (3) institutionalized participation, (4) protest, (5) civic participation, and (6) consumerist participation. Furthermore, the antecedents of consumerist, civic, and digitally networked participation, are very similar to those of older modes of participation such as protest and institutionalized participation. Whereas creative, expressive, and individualized modes appear to be expansions of protest activities, digitally networked forms clearly establish a new and distinct mode of political participation that fits in the general repertoire of political participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L., & BRADY, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,626
Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3597 · Cited by 5,186
Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1165 · Cited by 2,937
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality.
Seasholes, B., Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1974) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576853 · Cited by 2,576
Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science.
Fain, H., & Hempel, C. G. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091314 · Cited by 2,185
Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies
Barnes, S. H. (1979) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 1,932
Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1833 · Cited by 1,908
The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139198752 · Cited by 1,862
Metadata
- Authors
- Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W.
- Venue
- European Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-21
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-163
- ISSN
- 1755-7739 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-7747
- OpenAlex
- W2552189168
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 57.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The continuous expansion of citizen participation: a new taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1755773916000230
- The paper
- Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W. (2018). The continuous expansion of citizen participation: a new taxonomy. European Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773916000230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.