Cited by 82Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

Global redistribution of income and household energy footprints: a computational thought experiment

Open access
Oswald, Y., Steinberger, J.K., Ivanova, D., Millward-Hopkins, J.·2021·Global Sustainability

Abstract

Non-technical summary Global income inequality and energy consumption inequality are related. High-income households consume more energy than low-income ones, and for different purposes. Here, we explore the global household energy consumption implications of global income redistribution. We show that global income inequality shapes not only inequalities of energy consumption but the quantity and composition of overall energy demand. Our results call for the inclusion of income distribution into energy system models, as well as into energy and climate policy. Technical summary Despite a rapidly growing number of studies on the relationship between inequality and energy, there is little research estimating the effect of income redistribution on energy demand. We contribute to this debate by proposing a simple but granular and data-driven model of the global income distribution and of global household energy consumption. We isolate the effect of income distribution on household energy consumption and move beyond the assumption of aggregate income–energy elasticities. First, we model expenditure as a function of income. Second, we determine budget shares of expenditure for a variety of products and services by employing product-granular income elasticities of demand. Subsequently, we apply consumption-based final energy intensities to product and services to obtain energy footprint accounts. Testing variants of the global income distribution, we find that the ‘energy costs’ of equity are small. Equitable and inequitable distributions of income, however, entail distinct structural change in energy system terms. In an equitable world, fewer people live in energy poverty and more energy is consumed for subsistence and necessities, instead of luxury and transport. Social media summary Equality in global income shifts household energy footprints towards subsistence, while inequality shifts them towards transport and luxury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/sus.2021.1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even if a progressively financed UBI would not result in a net economy-wide increase in income and only redistributes from richer to poorer people, it could lead to an increase in consumption and associated emissions.

    “Even if a progressively financed UBI would not result in a net, economy-wide increase in income and only redistributes from richer to poorer peo ple, it could lead to an increase in consumption and associated emissions as shown in recent modelling of a hypothetical reduction of global inequality (Oswald et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Oswald, Y., Steinberger, J. K., Ivanova, D., & Millward-Hopkins, J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Oswald, Y.
Venue
Global Sustainability
Published
2021
Volume
4
ISSN
2059-4798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123601655
Cited by
82
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R035288/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
household energy consumption, income inequality, energy footprint, energy poverty, energy system modelling, climate and energy policy, transportation energy use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review