The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Political Theory and Power
Abstract
This book draws attention to certain significant changes in the way in which power has been defined and it also examines some of the critical responses which those changes have evoked. The objective is not to try and evolve a universally acceptable and comprehensive definition of power, and of realted terms like authority and influence. The argument of the book is that, that would be an impossible project since social and political theories themselves constitute an intervention into political discourse of a society and they may implicitly or explicitly embody a political perspective.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Algunos investigadores proponen que el poder social es la capacidad de los sujetos para transformar activamente sus sociedades, usualmente como resultado de la confrontación entre sus intereses y el de los otros actores sociales (Joseph 2004:4).”
From SUPERANDO LAS DICOTOMÍAS: EL QHAPAQ ÑAN COMO EJEMPLO DEL PATRIMONIO COMO PROCESO SOCIAL (2019) · cites this paper as Joseph 2004:4
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SUPERANDO LAS DICOTOMÍAS: EL QHAPAQ ÑAN COMO EJEMPLO DEL PATRIMONIO COMO PROCESO SOCIAL
Marcone Flores, G. (2019) · Chungará (Arica) · doi:10.4067/s0717-73562019005002001 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Joseph, S.
- Publisher
- Foundation Books
- Published
- 2004-04-24
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
