Cited by 31Social Media and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMisinformation and Its Impacts

Don’t @ Me: Experimentally Reducing Partisan Incivility on Twitter

Munger, Kevin·2021·Journal of Experimental Political Science

Abstract

I conduct an experiment which examines the impact of moral suasion on partisans engaged in uncivil arguments. Partisans often respond in vitriolic ways to politicians they disagree with, and this can engender hateful responses from partisans from the other side. This phenomenon was especially common during the contentious 2016 US Presidential Election. Using Twitter accounts that I controlled, I sanctioned people engaged partisan incivility in October 2016. I found that messages containing moral suasion were more effective at reducing incivility than were messages with no moral content in the first week post-treatment. There were no significant treatment effects in the first day post-treatment, emphasizing the need for research designs that measure effect duration. The type of moral suasion employed, however, did not have the expected differential effect on either Republicans or Democrats. These effects were significantly moderated by the anonymity of the subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/xps.2020.14

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identity- and empathy-based bystander interventions on social media can effectively reduce incivility, hate speech, and misinformation.

    “For instance, identity-and empathy-based bystander interventions on social media can effectively reduce incivility (Munger 2020), hate speech (Hangartner et al. 2021, Munger 2017, Siegel & Badaan 2020), and misinformation (Pretus et al. 2022).”

    From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Munger 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munger, K.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Munger, Kevin
Venue
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Published
2020-07-16
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
102-116
ISSN
  • 2052-2630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-2649
OpenAlex
W3043018575
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Political Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
moral suasion, online political discourse, Twitter, 2016 US presidential election, sanctions, anonymity, political polarization, vitriol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review