The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bismuth-Coated Carbon Electrodes for Anodic Stripping Voltammetry
Abstract
Bismuth-coated carbon electrodes display an attractive stripping voltammetric performance which compares favorably with that of common mercury-film electrodes. These bismuth-film electrodes are prepared by adding 400 microg/L (ppb) bismuth(III) directly to the sample solution and simultanously depositing the bismuth and target metals on the glassy-carbon or carbon-fiber substrate. Stripping voltammetric measurements of microgram per liter levels of cadmium, lead, thallium, and zinc in nondeaerated solutions yielded well-defined peaks, along with a low background, following short deposition periods. Detection limit of 1.1 and 0.3 ppb lead are obtained following 2- and 10-min deposition, respectively. Changes in the peak potentials (compared to those observed at mercury electrodes) offer new selectivity dimensions. Scanning electron microscopy sheds useful insights into the different morphologies of the bismuth deposits on the carbon substrates. The in situ bismuth-plated electrodes exhibit a wide accessible potential window (-1.2 to -0.2 V) that permits quantitation of most metals measured at mercury electrodes (except of copper, antimony, and bismuth itself). Numerous key experimental variables have been characterized and optimized. High reproducibility was indicated from the relative standard deviations (2.4 and 4.4%) for 22 repetitive measurements of 80 microg/L cadmium and lead, respectively. Such an attractive use of "mercury-free", environmetally friendly electrodes (with a performance equivalent to that of mercury ones) offers great promise to centralized and decentralized testing of trace metals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bio-Integrated Wearable Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Ray, T. R., Choi, J., Bandodkar, A. J., Krishnan, S., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Ghaffari, R., & Rogers, J. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573 · Cited by 1,350
Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction: from fundamental principles to catalyst design
Zhang, X., Guo, S.-X., Gandionco, K. A., Bond, A. M., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Materials Today Advances · doi:10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100074 · Cited by 322
Screen-printed electrodes for environmental monitoring of heavy metal ions: a review
Barton, J., García, M. B. G., Santos, D. H., Fanjul-Bolado, P., Ribotti, A., McCaul, M., Diamond, D., & Magni, P. (2016) · Microchimica Acta · doi:10.1007/s00604-015-1651-0 · Cited by 275
Wearable temporary tattoo sensor for real-time trace metal monitoring in human sweat
Kim, J., de Araujo, W. R., Samek, I. A., Bandodkar, A. J., Jia, W., Brunetti, B., Paixão, T. R. L. C., & Wang, J. (2015) · Electrochemistry Communications · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2014.11.024 · Cited by 245
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Lu, J., Hocevar, S. B., Farias, P. A. M., & Ogorevc, B.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3218-3222
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2013229047
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bismuth-Coated Carbon Electrodes for Anodic Stripping Voltammetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac000108x
- The paper
- Wang, J., Lu, J., Hocevar, S. B., Farias, P. A. M., & Ogorevc, B. (2000). Bismuth-Coated Carbon Electrodes for Anodic Stripping Voltammetry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000108x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.