The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors Controlling Precision and Accuracy in Isotope-Ratio-Monitoring Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
The performance of systems in which picomole quantities of sample are mixed with a carrier gas and passed through an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer system was examined experimentally and theoretically. Two different mass spectrometers were used, both having electron-impact ion sources and Faraday cup collector systems. One had an accelerating potential of 10kV and accepted 0.2 mL of He/min, producing, under those conditions, a maximum efficiency of 1 CO2 molecular ion collected per 700 molecules introduced. Comparable figures for the second instrument were 3 kV, 0.5 mL of He/min, and 14000 molecules/ion. Signal pathways were adjusted so that response times were <200 ms. Sample-related ion currents appeared as peaks with widths of 3-30 s. Isotope ratios were determined by comparison to signals produced by standard gases. In spite of rapid variations in signals, observed levels of performance were within a factor of 2 of shot-noise limits. For the 10-kV instrument, sample requirements for standard deviations of 0.1 and 0.5% were 45 and 1.7 pmol, respectively. Comparable requirements for the 3-kV instrument were 900 and 36 pmol. Drifts in instrumental characteristics were adequately neutralized when standards were observed at 20-min intervals. For the 10-kV instrument, computed isotopic compositions were independent of sample size and signal strength over the ranges examined. Nonlinearities of <0.04%/V were observed for the 3-kV system. Procedures for observation and subtraction of background ion currents were examined experimentally and theoretically. For sample/ background ratios varying from >10 to 0.3, precision is expected and observed to decrease approximately 2-fold and to depend only weakly on the precision with which background ion currents have been measured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Clumped-isotope” geochemistry—The study of naturally-occurring, multiply-substituted isotopologues
Eiler, J. M. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.08.020 · Cited by 774
Valley, J. W., Kitchen, N., Kohn, M. J., Niendorf, C. R., & Spicuzza, M. J. (1995) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00386-x · Cited by 696
Affek, H. P., Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A., Matthews, A., & Eiler, J. M. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.06.031 · Cited by 306
Clumped isotope thermometry of carbonatites as an indicator of diagenetic alteration
Dennis, K. J., & Schrag, D. P. (2010) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2010.04.005 · Cited by 292
Isotope‐ratio detection for gas chromatography
Sessions, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200600002 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Merritt, D. A., & Hayes, J. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2336-2347
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2036896289
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Controlling Precision and Accuracy in Isotope-Ratio-Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac00086a020
- The paper
- Merritt, D. A., & Hayes, J. M. (1994). Factors Controlling Precision and Accuracy in Isotope-Ratio-Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00086a020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.