The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Membrane Partition Coefficients Chromatographically Measured Using Immobilized Artificial Membrane Surfaces
Abstract
Immobilized artificial membranes (IAMs) are chromatographic surfaces prepared by covalently immobilizing cell membrane phospholipids. IAM surfaces mimic fluid cell membranes. Solute capacity factors (k'IAM) measured on IAM columns correlate very well with solute equilibrium partition coefficients (Km') measured in fluid liposome systems. For 23 structurally unrelated compounds, log-(k'IAM) correlates with log(Km') with a linear correlation coefficient r = 0.907. This indicates that solute partitioning between the IAM bonded phase and the aqueous mobile phase is similar to the solute partitioning between liposomes and the aqueous phase. Although both IAM chromatography and liposome partitioning can be used as in vitro methods to predict solute partitioning into cell membranes, IAM chromatography is experimentally convenient compared to liposome systems. To study the effect of lipid structure on drug binding to IAMs, IAMs were prepared from three different phosphatidylcholine ligands: (i) a diacylated phosphatidylcholine ligand, (ii) a single chain ether phosphatidylcholine ligand, and (iii) a single chain phosphatidylcholine ligand that lacks a glycerol backbone. Solute retention data were identical for all of these IAMs, and consequently, predictions of solute binding to fluid membranes were also identical. This indicates that the structure of the phosphatidylcholine ligand that is immobilized is not critical for the binding of solutes. Since the structure is not important, the binding of solutes to membranes is a bulk phase property, i.e., it is the interface created by the ligands that determines the solute binding properties, not the ligands themselves. Solute partitioning using octanol/water systems does not correlate with k'IAM unless a homologous series of hydrophobic solutes is being evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physicochemical Profiling (Solubility, Permeability and Charge State)
Avdeef, A. (2001) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026013395100 · Cited by 587
Avdeef, A., Box, K. J., Comer, J. E. A., Hibbert, C., & Tam, K. Y. (1998) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1011954332221 · Cited by 416
Droge, S. T. J. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05052 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, S., Liu, H., Qiu, X., Bhat, G., & Pidgeon, C.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-02-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 755-762
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2017499341
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane Partition Coefficients Chromatographically Measured Using Immobilized Artificial Membrane Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac00100a011
- The paper
- Ong, S., Liu, H., Qiu, X., Bhat, G., & Pidgeon, C. (1995). Membrane Partition Coefficients Chromatographically Measured Using Immobilized Artificial Membrane Surfaces. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00100a011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.