The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance and Optimization of a Combustion Interface for Isotope Ratio Monitoring Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Conditions and systems for on-line combustion of effluents from capillary gas chromatographic columns and for removal of water vapor from product streams were tested. Organic carbon in gas chromatographic peaks 15 s wide and containing up to 30 nanomoles of carbon was quantitatively converted to CO2 by tubular combustion reactors, 200 x 0.5 mm, packed with CuO or NiO. No auxiliary source of O2 was required because oxygen was supplied by metal oxides. Spontaneous degradation of CuO limited the life of CuO reactors at T > 850 degrees C. Since NiO does not spontaneously degrade, its use might be favored, but Ni-bound carbon phases form and lead to inaccurate isotopic results at T < 1050 degrees C if gas-phase O2 is not added. For all compounds tested except CH4, equivalent isotopic results are provided by CuO at 850 degrees C, NiO + O2 (gas-phase mole fraction, 10(-3)) at 1050 degrees C and NiO at 1150 degrees C. The combustion interface did not contribute additional analytical uncertainty, thus observed standard deviations of 13C/12C ratios were within a factor of 2 of shot-noise limits. For combustion and isotopic analyses of CH4, in which quantitative combustion required T approximately 950 degrees C, NiO-based systems are preferred, and precision is approximately 2 times lower than that observed for other analytes. Water must be removed from the gas stream transmitted to the mass spectrometer or else protonation of CO2 will lead to inaccuracy in isotopic analyses. Although thresholds for this effect vary between mass spectrometers, differential permeation of H2O through Nafion tubing was effective in both cases tested, but the required length of the Nafion membrane was 4 times greater for the more sensitive mass spectrometer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elsner, M., Zwank, L., Hunkeler, D., & Schwarzenbach, R. P. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0504587 · Cited by 572
Applied gas chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry
Meier-Augenstein, W. (1999) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(98)01057-7 · Cited by 425
Isotope‐ratio detection for gas chromatography
Sessions, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200600002 · Cited by 271
Phospholipid fatty acid stable isotope probing techniques in microbial ecology
Maxfield, P. J., & Evershed, R. P. (2014) · Stable Isotope Probing and Related Technologies · doi:10.1128/9781555816896.ch3 · Cited by 16
Brenna (1997) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2787(1997)16:5<227::aid-mas1>3.0.co;2-j
Metadata
- Authors
- Merritt, D. A., Freeman, K. H., Ricci, M. P., Studley, S. A., & Hayes, J. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-07-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2461-2473
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2065816346
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance and Optimization of a Combustion Interface for Isotope Ratio Monitoring Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac00110a022
- The paper
- Merritt, D. A., Freeman, K. H., Ricci, M. P., Studley, S. A., & Hayes, J. M. (1995). Performance and Optimization of a Combustion Interface for Isotope Ratio Monitoring Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00110a022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.