Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reduction of Signal Suppression Effects in ESI-MS Using a Nanosplitting Device

Gangl, Eric T., Annan, Meg, Spooner, Neil, Vouros, Paul·2001·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry is a valuable tool in the identification and quantification of drug metabolites in biological fluids. However, there are many instances where matrix components present in these fluids interfere with analyte detection and prevent the acquisition of accurate or complete results. In some instances, the matrix can suppress ionization to such an extent that analytes are completely undetectable by MS. In this work, we investigate how ionization and ion-transfer efficiencies are affected by drastically reducing the flow into the MS. A postcolumn concentric flow-splitting device was constructed to allow the measurement of analyte signal and ionization suppression across a range of flow rates (0.1-200 microL/min). Using this device, the effects of flow rate on signal intensity and ionization suppression were measured in analytical experiments that included flow injection analysis MS, postcolumn addition LC-MS, and on-line LC-MS analysis of metabolites generated from rat liver microsomes. The device used to deliver 0.1 microL/min flows is referred to as a nanosplitter because it achieved high split ratios (2000:1), producing flow rates comparable to those observed in nanoelectrospray. The nanosplitter maintained chromatographic integrity with high fidelity and allowed the direct comparison of analyte signal across a range of flow rates (0.1-200 microL/min). A significant improvement in concentration and mass sensitivity as well as a reduction in signal suppression is observed when the performance at 200 versus 0.1 microL/min flow rate is compared. Using this specially designed concentric splitting device, the advantages of ultralow flow ESI were easily exploited for applications employing large bore chromatography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac010501i

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Gangl, E. T., Annan, M., Spooner, N., & Vouros, P.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2001-10-30
Volume
73
Issue
23
Pages
5635-5644
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2032680924
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction of Signal Suppression Effects in ESI-MS Using a Nanosplitting Device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac010501i
The paper
Gangl, E. T., Annan, M., Spooner, N., & Vouros, P. (2001). Reduction of Signal Suppression Effects in ESI-MS Using a Nanosplitting Device. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010501i

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.