Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detection of Multiple Protein Conformational Ensembles in Solution via Deconvolution of Charge-State Distributions in ESI MS

Dobo, Andras, Kaltashov, Igor A.·2001·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Monitoring the changes in charge-state distributions of protein ions in electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra has become one of the commonly accepted tools to detect large-scale conformational changes of proteins in solution. However, these experiments produce only qualitative, low-resolution information. Our goal is to develop a procedure that would produce quantitative data on protein conformational isomers coexisting in solution at equilibrium. To that end, we have examined the evolution of positive ion charge-state distributions in the ESI spectra of two model proteins, α-helical myoglobin (Mb) and β-sheet cellular retinoic acid binding protein I (CRABP I), as a function of solution pH. A detailed analysis of the charge-state distributions over a wide range of pH (2.6−8.5) suggests that each spectrum (i.e., relative ion abundance I vs its charge state n ) can be approximated as a linear combination of a limited number of basis functions B i ( n ), i.e. I ( n ) = ∑ b i B i ( n ). These basis functions (approximated as normal, or Gaussian, distributions) are not significantly affected by the pH variations; however, their relative intensities (coefficients b i ) exhibit strong pH dependence giving rise to complicated overall charge-state distributions. Analysis of the experimental data, aided by the vast existing body of knowledge of Mb and CRABP I conformational properties (both structure and dynamics) leads to a conclusion that each basis function in fact represents a single conformational isomer. Average charge state corresponding to each basis function (e.g., position of the maximum of B i ( n ) on the protein ion charge scale n ) characterizes the conformer‘s overall shape (most likely, projected surface area). The width of each basis function (i.e., standard deviation of the normal distribution) represents the conformer's heterogeneity. Overall, this technique is suitable for analysis of complex mixtures of protein conformational isomers in solution and complements existing experimental methods that are used to study macromolecular dynamics by characterizing protein shape in solution (e.g., scattering techniques).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac010713f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Dobo, A., & Kaltashov, I. A.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2001-09-15
Volume
73
Issue
20
Pages
4763-4773
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W1975860187
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Multiple Protein Conformational Ensembles in Solution via Deconvolution of Charge-State Distributions in ESI MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac010713f
The paper
Dobo, A., & Kaltashov, I. A. (2001). Detection of Multiple Protein Conformational Ensembles in Solution via Deconvolution of Charge-State Distributions in ESI MS. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010713f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.