The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microfluidic Enzyme Immunoassay Using Silicon Microchip with Immobilized Antibodies and Chemiluminescence Detection
Abstract
Silicon microchips with immobilized antibodies were used to develop microfluidic enzyme immunoassays using chemiluminescence detection and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as the enzyme label. Polyclonal anti-atrazine antibodies were coupled to the silicon microchip surface with an overall dimension of 13.1 x 3.2 mm, comprising 42 porous flow channels of 235-microm depth and 25-microm width. Different immobilization protocols based on covalent or noncovalent modification of the silica surface with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) or 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GOPS), linear polyethylenimine (LPEI, MW 750,000), or branched polyethylenimine (BPEI, MW 25,000), followed by adsorption or covalent attachment of the antibody, were evaluated to reach the best reusability, stability, and sensitivity of the microfluidic enzyme immunoassay (microFEIA). Adsorption of antibodies on a LPEI-modified silica surface and covalent attachment to physically adsorbed BPEI lead to unstable antibody coatings. Covalent coupling of antibodies via glutaraldehyde (GA) to three different functionalized silica surfaces (APTES-GA, LPEI-GA, and GOPS-BPEI-GA) resulted in antibody coatings that could be completely regenerated using 0.4 M glycine/HCl, pH 2.2. The buffer composition was shown to have a dramatic effect on the assay stability, where the commonly used phosphate buffer saline was proved to be the least suitable choice. The best long-term stability was obtained for the LPEI-GA surface with no loss of antibody activity during one month. The detection limits in the microFEIA for the three different immuno surfaces were 45, 3.8, and 0.80 ng/L (209, 17.7, and 3.7 pM) for APTES-GA, LPEI-GA, and GOPS-BPEI-GA, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Posthuma-Trumpie, G. A., Korf, J., & van Amerongen, A. (2009) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-008-2287-2 · Cited by 1,540
A Comprehensive Review on Function and Application of Plant Peroxidases
Pandey, V. P., Awasthi, M., Singh, S., Tiwari, S., & Dwivedi, U. N. (2017) · Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.4172/2161-1009.1000308 · Cited by 389
Biotechnological applications of bioluminescence and chemiluminescence
RODA, A. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.011 · Cited by 357
Microfluidic systems in proteomics
Lion, N., Rohner, T. C., Dayon, L., Arnaud, I. L., Damoc, E., Youhnovski, N., Wu, Z., Roussel, C., Josserand, J., Jensen, H., et al. (2003) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200305629 · Cited by 262
Horseradish peroxidase: a valuable tool in biotechnology
Azevedo, A. M., Martins, V. C., Prazeres, D. M. F., Vojinović, V., Cabral, J. M. S., & Fonseca, L. P. (2003) · Biotechnology Annual Review · doi:10.1016/s1387-2656(03)09003-3 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Yakovleva, J., Davidsson, R., Lobanova, A., Bengtsson, M., Eremin, S., Laurell, T., & Emnéus, J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-25
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2994-3004
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2069633260
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfluidic Enzyme Immunoassay Using Silicon Microchip with Immobilized Antibodies and Chemiluminescence Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac015645b
- The paper
- Yakovleva, J., Davidsson, R., Lobanova, A., Bengtsson, M., Eremin, S., Laurell, T., & Emnéus, J. (2002). Microfluidic Enzyme Immunoassay Using Silicon Microchip with Immobilized Antibodies and Chemiluminescence Detection. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac015645b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.