The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Small-Scale Analysis of O-Linked Oligosaccharides from Glycoproteins and Mucins Separated by Gel Electrophoresis
Abstract
A technique with subpicomolar sensitivity was developed for analyzing O-linked oligosaccharides released from glycoproteins separated by gel electrophoresis. The protocol involves gel electrophoresis, electroblotting to poly-(vinylidene fluoride) membrane, reductive beta-elimination, and analysis of released oligosaccharides by liquid chromatography coupled to negative ion electrospray mass spectrometry. It was also found that N-linked oligosaccharides could be recovered under the same conditions, found both as free oligosaccharides and as distinct glycopeptides created from reductive cleavage of the protein backbone, giving some information on site-specific glycosylation. The method was used to demonstrate that the difference between human alpha-2HS-glycoprotein isoforms separated by 2D-gel electrophoresis was partially due to sialylation of both O-linked and N-linked oligosaccharides. It was also shown that both acidic and neutral oligosaccharides could be recovered and analyzed simultaneously from high molecular mass (200,000-5,000,000 Da) highly glycosylated mucin glycoproteins collected from small intestine and saliva and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose/polyacrylamide composite gels. Mass spectrometric data not only gave information about the mass distribution of the heterogeneous mixtures of oligosaccharides from [M - xH](x-) ions but also gave information about the isomeric heterogeneity of the oligosaccharides from their resolution by porous graphitized carbon chromatography. Tandem mass spectrometry was explored as a technique for distinguishing between oligosaccharide isomers with different sequences and also between oligosaccharides with the same sequence but with different linkage configurations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacteria Penetrate the Inner Mucus Layer before Inflammation in the Dextran Sulfate Colitis Model
Johansson, M. E. V., Gustafsson, J. K., Sjöberg, K. E., Petersson, J., Holm, L., Sjövall, H., & Hansson, G. C. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012238 · Cited by 368
Larsson, J. M. H., Karlsson, H., Crespo, J. G., Johansson, M. E. V., Eklund, L., Sjövall, H., & Hansson, G. C. (2011) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1002/ibd.21625 · Cited by 360
High-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Porous graphitic carbon: A versatile stationary phase for liquid chromatography
West, C., Elfakir, C., & Lafosse, M. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.052 · Cited by 270
Mucin‐type O‐glycosylation – putting the pieces together
Jensen, P. H., Kolarich, D., & Packer, N. H. (2010) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07429.x · Cited by 252
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulz, B. L., Packer, N. H., & Karlsson, N. G.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-10-17
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6088-6097
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2023912458
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.