The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Preparation: Quo Vadis?
Abstract
The sample preparation step in an analytical process typically consists of an extraction procedure that results in the isolation and enrichment of components of interest from a sample matrix. Extraction can vary in degree of selectivity, speed, and convenience and depends not only on the approach and conditions used but on the geometric configurations of the extraction phase. Increased interest in sample preparation research has been generated by the introduction of nontraditional extraction technologies. These technologies address the need for reduction of solvent use, automation, and miniaturization and ultimately lead to on-site in situ and in vivo implementation. These extraction approaches are frequently easier to operate but provide optimization challenges. More fundamental knowledge is required by an analytical chemist not only about equilibrium conditions but, more importantly, about the kinetics of mass transfer in the extraction systems. Optimization of this extraction process enhances overall analysis. Proper design of the extraction devices and procedures facilitates convenient on-site implementation, integration with sampling, and separation/quantification, automation, or both. The key to rational choice, optimization, and design is an understanding of the fundamental principles governing mass transfer of analytes in multiphase systems. The objective of this perspective is to summarize the fundamental aspects of sample preparation and anticipate future developments and research needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solvent Microextraction into a Single Drop
Jeannot, M. A., & Cantwell, F. F. (1996) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac960042z · Cited by 1,282
Cited by
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402
Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach in food and herbal plants extraction: A review
Mustafa, A., & Turner, C. (2011) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.07.018 · Cited by 1,104
Solid‐phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis
Vas, G., & Vékey, K. (2004) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.606 · Cited by 615
Nondestructive Sampling of Living Systems Using in Vivo Solid-Phase Microextraction
Ouyang, G., Vuckovic, D., & Pawliszyn, J. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100203t · Cited by 426
Self-citationChen, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, X., & Qiu, C. (2008) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.026 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Pawliszyn, J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-05-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2543-2558
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2035796501
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sample Preparation: Quo Vadis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac034094h
- The paper
- Pawliszyn, J. (2003). Sample Preparation: Quo Vadis? Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034094h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.