The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LC-UV-Solid-Phase Extraction-NMR-MS Combined with a Cryogenic Flow Probe and Its Application to the Identification of Compounds Present in Greek Oregano
Open accessAbstract
Structure elucidation of natural products usually relies on a combination of NMR spectroscopy with mass spectrometry whereby NMR trails MS in terms of the minimum sample amount required. In the present study, the usefulness of on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) in LC-NMR for peak storage after the LC separation prior to NMR analysis is demonstrated. The SPE unit allows the use of normal protonated solvents for the LC separation and fully deuterated solvents for flushing the trapped compounds to the NMR probe. Thus, solvent suppression is no longer necessary. Multiple trapping of the same analyte from repeated LC injections was utilized to solve the problem of low concentration and to obtain 2D heteronuclear NMR spectra. In addition, a combination of the SPE unit with a recently developed cryoflow NMR probe and an MS was evaluated. This on-line LC-UV-SPE-NMR-MS system was used for the automated analysis of a Greek oregano extract. Combining the data provided by the UV, MS, and NMR spectra, the flavonoids taxifolin, aromadendrin, eriodictyol, naringenin, and apigenin, the phenolic acid rosmarinic acid, and the monoterpene carvacrol were identified. This automated technique is very useful for natural product analysis, and the large sensitivity improvement leads to significantly reduced NMR acquisition times.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louden, D., Handley, A., Lafont, R., Taylor, S., Sinclair, I., Lenz, E., Orton, T., & Wilson, I. D. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0107397 · Cited by 63
Cited by
The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery
Koehn, F. E., & Carter, G. T. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1657 · Cited by 2,572
Bendini, A., Cerretani, L., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A., Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Segura-Carretero, A., Fernández-Gutiérrez, A., & Lercker, G. (2007) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/12081679 · Cited by 784
Sources of natural phenolic antioxidants
DIMITRIOS, B. (2006) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.004 · Cited by 665
A Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolome Database for Tomato
Moco, S., Bino, R. J., Vorst, O., Verhoeven, H. A., de Groot, J., van Beek, T. A., Vervoort, J., & de Vos, C. H. R. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.078428 · Cited by 577
Self-citationCryogenically cooled probes—a leap in NMR technology
Kovacs, H., Moskau, D., & Spraul, M. (2005) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.03.001 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Exarchou, V., Godejohann, M., van Beek, T. A., Gerothanassis, I. P., & Vervoort, J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-10-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6288-6294
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2014946840
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.