The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peer Reviewed: Top-Down Proteomics
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVFeaturesNEXTPeer Reviewed: Top-Down ProteomicsA growing number of labs are using many types of mass spectrometers to directly analyze intact proteins and to improve conversion of MS data into biological knowledgeNeil L. KelleherCite this: Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 11, 196 A–203 APublication Date (Web):June 1, 2004Publication History Published online1 June 2004Published inissue 1 June 2004https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac0415657https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0415657newsACS Publications. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views6643Altmetric-Citations468LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (407 KB) Get e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Proteomics Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry
Siuti, N., & Kelleher, N. L. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1097 · Cited by 503
Self-citationTop Down proteomics: Facts and perspectives
Catherman, A. D., Skinner, O. S., & Kelleher, N. L. (2014) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.041 · Cited by 507
Self-citationProtein identification using sequential ion/ion reactions and tandem mass spectrometry
Coon, J. J., Ueberheide, B., Syka, J. E. P., Dryhurst, D. D., Ausio, J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503189102 · Cited by 373
Michalski, A., Damoc, E., Lange, O., Denisov, E., Nolting, D., Müller, M., Viner, R., Schwartz, J., Remes, P., Belford, M., et al. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.013698 · Cited by 373
ProSight Lite: Graphical software to analyze top‐down mass spectrometry data
Fellers, R. T., Greer, J. B., Early, B. P., Yu, X., LeDuc, R. D., Kelleher, N. L., & Thomas, P. M. (2015) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201400313 · Cited by 247
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelleher, N. L.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 196 A-203 A
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2014405882
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Reviewed: Top-Down Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0415657
- The paper
- Kelleher, N. L. (2004). Peer Reviewed: Top-Down Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0415657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
