Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Microfluidics with In-Line Sample Purification for Proteomics Analyses with MALDI-MS

Wheeler, Aaron R., Moon, Hyejin, Bird, Christopher A., Ogorzalek Loo, Rachel R., Kim, Chang-Jin “C.J.”, Loo, Joseph A., Garrell, Robin L.·2005·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

An in-line sample purification method for MALDI-MS, which relies on the electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD)-based technique for digital microfluidics, is reported. In this method, a droplet containing peptides and impurities is moved by EWOD and deposited onto a Teflon-AF surface. A droplet of water is subsequently moved over the spot, where it dissolves and removes the impurities. A droplet containing MALDI matrix is then moved to the spot, which is analyzed by MALDI-MS. This purification method reduces the number of salt adduct peaks caused by low concentrations of impurities (e.g., 20 mM sodium phosphate), and reduces or eliminates the catastrophic effects of high concentrations of impurities (e.g., 8 M urea). The method was used to purify spots made by depositing multiple droplets of contaminated peptides. Spectra from the purified spots showed an increase in the S/N ratio as a function of the number of droplets deposited; when not purified, the S/N ratio remained constant regardless of the number of droplets. Finally, the method was used to purify protein digests for peptide mass fragment (PMF) searches, and was shown to be more efficient than the conventional method of purification with reversed-phase-packed pipet tips. We anticipate this new, in-line sample purification technique for EWOD-MALDI-MS will enable development of integrated high-throughput proteomics analysis methodologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac048754+

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Wheeler, A. R., Moon, H., Bird, C. A., Ogorzalek Loo, R. R., Kim, C.-J. “. J. ”., Loo, J. A., & Garrell, R. L.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2004-12-17
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
534-540
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2039083654
Cited by
255
References
16
FWCI
14.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Microfluidics with In-Line Sample Purification for Proteomics Analyses with MALDI-MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac048754+
The paper
Wheeler, A. R., Moon, H., Bird, C. A., Ogorzalek Loo, R. R., Kim, C.-J. “. J. ”., Loo, J. A., & Garrell, R. L. (2005). Digital Microfluidics with In-Line Sample Purification for Proteomics Analyses with MALDI-MS. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac048754%2B

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.