The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific Method for the Determination of Genomic DNA Methylation by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Herein we report a novel method for determining genomic DNA methylation that utilizes liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) to measure 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine levels following enzymatic hydrolysis of genomic DNA. LC separation of 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine from the four deoxyribonucleosides, the four ribonucleosides, and 5-methyl-2'-cytidine, a RNA methylation product, has been achieved within 15 min. In combination with ESI-MS/MS detection, the reported method is highly specific and extremely sensitive with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.2 fmol and a quantification linearity range from 1 fmol to 20 pmol. Genomic DNA methylation was expressed as the ratio of 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine to 2'-deoxyguanosine and was determined directly using 2'-deoxyguanosine as the internal standard. Because deoxycytidine methylation typically ranges from 2 to 6% in mammalian genomes, and pharmacological or genetic manipulations have not achieved levels lower than 0.1%, we validated the assay for methylation levels ranging from 0.05 to 10%. Importantly, both RNA contamination and incomplete DNA hydrolysis had no appreciable effect on 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine quantification. LOD studies indicate that only 4 ng of DNA is required for this assay. This LOD should permit the use of this method for applications having limiting amounts of DNA that were not previously candidates for global genomic DNA methylation analysis, e.g., clinical trial samples, or cells collected by laser capture microdissection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation
Challen, G. A., Sun, D., Jeong, M., Luo, M., Jelinek, J., Berg, J. S., Bock, C., Vasanthakumar, A., Gu, H., Xi, Y., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1009 · Cited by 1,122
Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons
Feng, J., Zhou, Y., Campbell, S. L., Le, T., Li, E., Sweatt, J. D., Silva, A. J., & Fan, G. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2514 · Cited by 1,019
DNA Demethylation in Zebrafish Involves the Coupling of a Deaminase, a Glycosylase, and Gadd45
Rai, K., Huggins, I. J., James, S. R., Karpf, A. R., Jones, D. A., & Cairns, B. R. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042 · Cited by 657
Self-citationNNMT promotes epigenetic remodeling in cancer by creating a metabolic methylation sink
Ulanovskaya, O. A., Zuhl, A. M., & Cravatt, B. F. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1204 · Cited by 447
Mutations in DNMT1 cause hereditary sensory neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss
Klein, C. J., Botuyan, M.-V., Wu, Y., Ward, C. J., Nicholson, G. A., Hammans, S., Hojo, K., Yamanishi, H., Karpf, A. R., Wallace, D. C., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.830 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, L., James, S. R., Kazim, L., & Karpf, A. R.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 504-510
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2085561926
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific Method for the Determination of Genomic DNA Methylation by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0489420
- The paper
- Song, L., James, S. R., Kazim, L., & Karpf, A. R. (2005). Specific Method for the Determination of Genomic DNA Methylation by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0489420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.