The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneous Surface Plasmon Resonance and Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring Measurements of Biomolecular Adsorption Events Involving Structural Transformations and Variations in Coupled Water
Abstract
Simultaneous quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements are used to analyze the surface kinetics of two biomacromolecular systems, one lipid and one protein based, undergoing surface-induced conformational changes. First we establish a theoretical platform, which allows quantitative analysis of the combined SPR and QCM-D data. With this theoretical base, new information can be extracted, not obtainable with either technique alone. As an example we demonstrate how time-resolved measurements with these two techniques in combination--yielding three independent measured quantities--add new information about (i) kinetics, i.e. number of adsorbed molecules per unit area versus time, and (ii) temporal variation in the mass fraction of coupled water versus coverage. In particular, it is demonstrated for the first time, how the kinetics of the process during which adsorbed vesicles are spontaneously transformed into a supported phospholipid bilayer (SPB) on SiO(2) can be quantitatively separated into its two dominating states: adsorbed vesicles and supported planar bilayer patches. In addition, the relevance of dynamically coupled water for interpretation and modeling of the QCM-D response during bilayer formation is discussed and further illustrated with a second model system: streptavidin adsorption on a biotin-modified SPB. A very strong coverage dependence in the number of water molecules per protein sensed by the QCM is demonstrated, with strong implications for the use of QCM as a tool for quantitative determination of protein mass uptake kinetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reviakine, I., Johannsmann, D., & Richter, R. P. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac201778h · Cited by 871
Protein–polyelectrolyte interactions
Kayitmazer, A. B., Seeman, D., Minsky, B. B., Dubin, P. L., & Xu, Y. (2013) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c2sm27002a · Cited by 406
Nanoplasmonic sensors for biointerfacial science
Jackman, J. A., Rahim Ferhan, A., & Cho, N.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00494f · Cited by 258
Orelma, H., Filpponen, I., Johansson, L.-S., Laine, J., & Rojas, O. J. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm201236a · Cited by 200
Relevance of glycosylation of S-layer proteins for cell surface properties
Schuster, B., & Sleytr, U. B. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.020 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimhult, E., Larsson, C., Kasemo, B., & Höök, F.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-06
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7211-7220
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2013481880
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.