The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Neutral Loss Activation Method for Improved Phosphopeptide Sequence Analysis by Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Recent advances in phosphopeptide enrichment prior to mass spectrometric analysis show genuine promise for characterization of phosphoproteomes. Tandem mass spectrometry of phosphopeptide ions, using collision-activated dissociation (CAD), often produces product ions dominated by the neutral loss of phosphoric acid. Here we describe a novel method, termed Pseudo MS(n), for phosphopeptide ion dissociation in quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometers. The method induces collisional activation of product ions, those resulting from neutral loss(es) of phosphoric acid, following activation of the precursor ion. Thus, the principal neutral loss product ions are converted into a variety of structurally informative species. Since product ions from both the original precursor activation and all subsequent neutral loss product activations are simultaneously stored, the method generates a "composite" spectrum containing fragments derived from multiple precursors. In comparison to analysis by conventional MS/MS (CAD), Pseudo MS(n) shows improved phosphopeptide ion dissociation for 7 out of 10 synthetic phosphopeptides, as judged by an automated search algorithm (TurboSEQUEST). A similar overall improvement was observed upon application of Pseudo MS(n) to peptides generated by enzymatic digestion of a single phosphoprotein. Finally, when applied to a complex phosphopeptide mixture, several phosphopeptides mis-assigned by TurboSEQUEST under the conventional CAD approach were successfully identified after analysis by Pseudo MS(n).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
InsPecT: Identification of Posttranslationally Modified Peptides from Tandem Mass Spectra
Tanner, S., Shu, H., Frank, A., Wang, L.-C., Zandi, E., Mumby, M., Pevzner, P. A., & Bafna, V. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac050102d · Cited by 567
Sugiyama, N., Masuda, T., Shinoda, K., Nakamura, A., Tomita, M., & Ishihama, Y. (2007) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.t600060-mcp200 · Cited by 435
Zhang, Q., Ames, J. M., Smith, R. D., Baynes, J. W., & Metz, T. O. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800858h · Cited by 421
Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response
Morin, I., Ngo, H., Greenall, A., Zubko, M. K., Morrice, N., & Lydall, D. (2008) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.171 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., Schwartz, J. C., Hunt, D. F., & Coon, J. J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-05-18
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3590-3598
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2060369427
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Neutral Loss Activation Method for Improved Phosphopeptide Sequence Analysis by Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0497104
- The paper
- Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., Schwartz, J. C., Hunt, D. F., & Coon, J. J. (2004). A Neutral Loss Activation Method for Improved Phosphopeptide Sequence Analysis by Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0497104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.