Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 564

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solvent-Dependent Metabolite Distribution, Clustering, and Protein Extraction for Serum Profiling with Mass Spectrometry

Want, Elizabeth J., O'Maille, Grace, Smith, Colin A., Brandon, Theodore R., Uritboonthai, Wilasinee, Qin, Chuan, Trauger, Sunia A., Siuzdak, Gary·2006·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The aim of metabolite profiling is to monitor all metabolites within a biological sample for applications in basic biochemical research as well as pharmacokinetic studies and biomarker discovery. Here, novel data analysis software, XCMS, was used to monitor all metabolite features detected from an array of serum extraction methods, with application to metabolite profiling using electrospray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (ESI-LC/MS). The XCMS software enabled the comparison of methods with regard to reproducibility, the number and type of metabolite features detected, and the similarity of these features between different extraction methods. Extraction efficiency with regard to metabolite feature hydrophobicity was examined through the generation of unique feature density distribution plots, displaying feature distribution along chromatographic time. Hierarchical clustering was performed to highlight similarities in the metabolite features observed between the extraction methods. Protein extraction efficiency was determined using the Bradford assay, and the residual proteins were identified using nano-LC/MS/MS. Additionally, the identification of four of the most intensely ionized serum metabolites using FTMS and tandem mass spectrometry was reported. The extraction methods, ranging from organic solvents and acids to heat denaturation, varied widely in both protein removal efficiency and the number of mass spectral features detected. Methanol protein precipitation followed by centrifugation was found to be the most effective, straightforward, and reproducible approach, resulting in serum extracts containing over 2000 detected metabolite features and less than 2% residual protein. Interestingly, the combination of all approaches produced over 10,000 unique metabolite features, a number that is indicative of the complexity of the human metabolome and the potential of metabolomics in biomarker discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac051312t

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 564

Metadata

Authors
Want, E. J., O'Maille, G., Smith, C. A., Brandon, T. R., Uritboonthai, W., Qin, C., Trauger, S. A., & Siuzdak, G.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2005-12-16
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
743-752
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2079857213
Cited by
564
References
0
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solvent-Dependent Metabolite Distribution, Clustering, and Protein Extraction for Serum Profiling with Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac051312t
The paper
Want, E. J., O'Maille, G., Smith, C. A., Brandon, T. R., Uritboonthai, W., Qin, C., Trauger, S. A., & Siuzdak, G. (2006). Solvent-Dependent Metabolite Distribution, Clustering, and Protein Extraction for Serum Profiling with Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051312t

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.