The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Resolution Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry Using New Planar Geometry Analyzers
Open accessAbstract
Field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) has emerged as a powerful tool of broad utility for separation and characterization of gas-phase ions, especially in conjunction with mass spectrometry (MS). In FAIMS, ions are filtered by the dependence of mobility on electric field while being carried by gas flow through the analytical gap between two electrodes of either planar (p-) or cylindrical (c-) geometry. Most FAIMS/MS systems employ c-FAIMS because of its ease of coupling to MS, yet the merits of the two geometries have not been compared in detail. Here, a priori simulations reveal that reducing the FAIMS curvature always improves resolution at equal sensitivity. In particular, the resolving power of p-FAIMS exceeds that of c-FAIMS, typically by a factor of 2-4 depending on the ion species and carrier gas. We have constructed a new planar FAIMS incorporating a curtain plate interface for effective operation with an ESI ion source and joined to an MS using an ion funnel interface with a novel slit aperture. The resolution increases up to 4-fold over existing c-FAIMS, even though the analysis is approximately 2 times faster. This allows separation of species not feasible in previous FAIMS studies, e.g., protonated leucine and isoleucine or new bradykinin isomers. The improvement for protein conformers (of ubiquitin) is less significant, possibly because of multiple unresolved geometries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Cited by
Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
Gabelica, V., Shvartsburg, A. A., Afonso, C., Barran, P., Benesch, J. L. P., Bleiholder, C., Bowers, M. T., Bilbao, A., Bush, M. F., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21585 · Cited by 493
Self-citationReview on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation
Cumeras, R., Figueras, E., Davis, C. E., Baumbach, J. I., & Gràcia, I. (2015) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c4an01100g · Cited by 459
Protein Complexes in the Gas Phase: Technology for Structural Genomics and Proteomics
Benesch, J. L. P., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068289b · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Shvartsburg, A. A., Li, F., Tang, K., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-05-06
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3706-3714
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1983012121
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Resolution Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry Using New Planar Geometry Analyzers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac052020v
- The paper
- Shvartsburg, A. A., Li, F., Tang, K., & Smith, R. D. (2006). High-Resolution Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry Using New Planar Geometry Analyzers. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac052020v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.