The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Urine as Test Material in 1H NMR-Based Metabonomics: Recommendations for Sample Preparation and Storage
Abstract
Metabonomic approaches are believed to have the capability of revolutionizing diagnosis of diseases and assessment of patient conditions after medical interventions. In order to ensure comparability of metabonomic 1H NMR data from different studies, we suggest validated sample preparation guidelines for human urine based on a stability study that evaluates effects of storage time and temperature, freeze-drying, and the presence of preservatives. The results indicated that human urine samples should be stored at or below -25 degrees C, as no changes in the 1H NMR fingerprints have been observed during storage at this temperature for 26 weeks. Formation of acetate, presumably due to microbial contamination, was occasionally observed in samples stored at 4 degrees C without addition of a preservative. Addition of a preserving agent is not mandatory provided that the samples are stored at -25 degrees C. Thus, no differences were observed between 1H NMR spectra of nonpreserved urines and urines with added sodium azide and stored at -25 degrees C, whereas the presence of sodium fluoride caused a shift of especially citrate resonances. Freeze-drying of urine and reconstitution in D2O at pH 7.4 resulted in the disappearance of the creatinine CH2 signal at delta 4.06 due to deuteration. A study evaluating the effects of phosphate buffer concentration on signal variability and assessment of the probability of citrate or creatinine resonances crossing bucket border (a boundary between adjacent integrated regions) led to the conclusion that a minimum buffer concentration of 0.3 M is adequate for normal urines used in this study. However, final buffer concentration of 1 M will be required for very concentrated urines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scalbert, A., Brennan, L., Fiehn, O., Hankemeier, T., Kristal, B. S., van Ommen, B., Pujos-Guillot, E., Verheij, E., Wishart, D., & Wopereis, S. (2009) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-009-0168-0 · Cited by 565
Gika, H. G., Theodoridis, G. A., Wingate, J. E., & Wilson, I. D. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070183p · Cited by 502
Integration of GC–MS and LC–MS for untargeted metabolomics profiling
Zeki, Ö. C., Eylem, C. C., Reçber, T., Kır, S., & Nemutlu, E. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113509 · Cited by 336
NMR-based metabolomics in human disease diagnosis: applications, limitations, and recommendations
Emwas, A.-H. M., Salek, R. M., Griffin, J. L., & Merzaban, J. (2013) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-013-0524-y · Cited by 296
Posada-Ayala, M., Zubiri, I., Martin-Lorenzo, M., Sanz-Maroto, A., Molero, D., Gonzalez-Calero, L., Fernandez-Fernandez, B., de la Cuesta, F., Laborde, C. M., Barderas, M. G., et al. (2014) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2013.328 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauridsen, M., Hansen, S. H., Jaroszewski, J. W., & Cornett, C.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-01-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1181-1186
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2071588610
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Urine as Test Material in 1H NMR-Based Metabonomics: Recommendations for Sample Preparation and Storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac061354x
- The paper
- Lauridsen, M., Hansen, S. H., Jaroszewski, J. W., & Cornett, C. (2007). Human Urine as Test Material in 1H NMR-Based Metabonomics: Recommendations for Sample Preparation and Storage. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061354x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.