The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Identification of Conserved Metabolites in GC/MS Data for Metabolomics and Biomarker Discovery
Abstract
Analysis of metabolomic profiling data from gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) measurements usually relies upon reference libraries of metabolite mass spectra to structurally identify and track metabolites. In general, techniques to enumerate and track unidentified metabolites are nonsystematic and require manual curation. We present a method and software implementation, freely available at http://spectconnect.mit.edu, that can systematically detect components that are conserved across samples without the need for a reference library or manual curation. We validate this approach by correctly identifying the components in a known mixture and the discriminating components in a spiked mixture. Finally, we demonstrate an application of this approach with a brief analysis of the Escherichia coli metabolome. By systematically cataloguing conserved metabolite peaks prior to data analysis methods, our approach broadens the scope of metabolomics and facilitates biomarker discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolic Network
Förster, J., Famili, I., Fu, P., Palsson, B. Ø., & Nielsen, J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.234503 · Cited by 1,069
Hellerstein, M. K. (2004) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2003.10.005 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Metabolomics by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry: Combined Targeted and Untargeted Profiling
Fiehn, O. (2016) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb3004s114 · Cited by 917
Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI‐compliant studies
Fiehn, O., Wohlgemuth, G., Scholz, M., Kind, T., Lee, D. Y., Lu, Y., Moon, S., & Nikolau, B. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03387.x · Cited by 675
Charbonneau, M. R., O’Donnell, D., Blanton, L. V., Totten, S. M., Davis, J. C. C., Barratt, M. J., Cheng, J., Guruge, J., Talcott, M., Bain, J. R., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.024 · Cited by 606
Identifying metabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass spectrometry cheminformatics
Lai, Z., Tsugawa, H., Wohlgemuth, G., Mehta, S., Mueller, M., Zheng, Y., Ogiwara, A., Meissen, J., Showalter, M., Takeuchi, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4512 · Cited by 560
Quantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: status and perspectives
Koek, M. M., Jellema, R. H., van der Greef, J., Tas, A. C., & Hankemeier, T. (2011) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0254-3 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Styczynski, M. P., Moxley, J. F., Tong, L. V., Walther, J. L., Jensen, K. L., & Stephanopoulos, G. N.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-24
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 966-973
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2030586375
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Identification of Conserved Metabolites in GC/MS Data for Metabolomics and Biomarker Discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0614846
- The paper
- Styczynski, M. P., Moxley, J. F., Tong, L. V., Walther, J. L., Jensen, K. L., & Stephanopoulos, G. N. (2007). Systematic Identification of Conserved Metabolites in GC/MS Data for Metabolomics and Biomarker Discovery. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0614846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.