The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization and Resolution of Evaporation-Mediated Osmolality Shifts That Constrain Microfluidic Cell Culture in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Devices
Open accessAbstract
Evaporation is a critical problem when handling submicroliter volumes of fluids. This paper characterizes this problem as it applies to microfluidic cell culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) devices and provides a practical solution. Evaporation-mediated osmolality shifts through PDMS membranes with varying thicknesses (10, 1, 0.2, or 0.1 mm) were measured over 96 h. Even in humidified cell culture incubators, evaporation through PDMS and associated shifts in the osmolality of culture media was significant and prevented mouse embryo and human endothelial cell growth and development. A simple diffusion model, where the measured diffusion coefficient for PDMS matches reported values of approximately 10-9 m2/s, accounts for these evaporation and osmolality shifts. To overcome this problem, a PDMS-parylene-PDMS hybrid membrane was developed that greatly suppresses evaporation and osmolality shifts, yet possesses thinness and the flexibility necessary to interface with deformation-based microfluidic actuation systems, maintains the clarity for optical microscopy, and enables the successful development of single-cell mouse embryos into blastocysts under static conditions and culture of human endothelial cells under dynamic recirculation of submicroliter volumes of media. These insights and methods demonstrated specifically for embryo and endothelial cell studies will be generally useful for understanding and overcoming evaporation-associated effects in microfluidic cell cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Permeation-driven flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices.
Randall, G. C., & Doyle, P. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503287102 · Cited by 220
Cited by
The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research
Sackmann, E. K., Fulton, A. L., & Beebe, D. J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13118 · Cited by 2,995
Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
PDMS with designer functionalities—Properties, modifications strategies, and applications
Wolf, M. P., Salieb-Beugelaar, G. B., & Hunziker, P. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.001 · Cited by 853
Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia
Berthier, E., Young, E. W. K., & Beebe, D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc20982a · Cited by 799
Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments
Young, E. W. K., & Beebe, D. J. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b909900j · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Heo, Y. S., Cabrera, L. M., Song, J. W., Futai, N., Tung, Y.-C., Smith, G. D., & Takayama, S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-22
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1126-1134
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1987964430
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and Resolution of Evaporation-Mediated Osmolality Shifts That Constrain Microfluidic Cell Culture in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac061990v
- The paper
- Heo, Y. S., Cabrera, L. M., Song, J. W., Futai, N., Tung, Y.-C., Smith, G. D., & Takayama, S. (2007). Characterization and Resolution of Evaporation-Mediated Osmolality Shifts That Constrain Microfluidic Cell Culture in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Devices. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061990v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.