The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colloidal Graphite-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry and MSn of Small Molecules. 1. Imaging of Cerebrosides Directly from Rat Brain Tissue
Abstract
Graphite-assisted laser desorption/ionization (GALDI) mass spectrometry (MS) was investigated for analysis of cerebrosides in a complex total brain lipid extract. Conventional MALDI MS and GALDI MS were compared regarding lipid analysis by using high-vacuum (HV, <10-6 Torr) LDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry and intermediate-pressure (IP, 0.17 Torr) linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Cerebrosides were not detected or detected with low sensitivity in MALDI MS because of other dominant phospholipids. By using GALDI, cerebrosides were detected as intense mass peaks without prior separation from other lipid species while mass peaks corresponding to phosphatidylcholines (PCs) were weak. The signal increase for cerebrosides and the signal decrease for PCs in GALDI MS were more significant in HV than in IP. MSn experiments of precursor ions corresponding to cerebrosides and PCs in brain lipid extract were performed to identify the detected species and distinguish isobaric ions. Twenty-two cerebroside species were detected by GALDI whereas eight cerebroside species were detected by MALDI. Sulfatides in brain lipid extract were also easily detected by GALDI MS in the negative ion mode. By forming a colloidal graphite thin film on rat brain tissue, direct lipid profiling by imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) was performed. Chemically selective images for cerebrosides and sulfatides were successfully obtained. Imaging tandem mass spectrometry (IMS/MS) was performed to generate images of specific product ions from isobaric species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Cited by
Sphingolipid and Glycosphingolipid Metabolic Pathways in the Era of Sphingolipidomics
Merrill, A. H. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002917 · Cited by 785
MALDI Imaging of Lipid Biochemistry in Tissues by Mass Spectrometry
Zemski Berry, K. A., Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M., Spraggins, J. M., Caprioli, R. M., & Murphy, R. C. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200280p · Cited by 386
An update of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in lipid research
Fuchs, B., Süß, R., & Schiller, J. (2010) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2010.07.001 · Cited by 324
Srivastava, M. (2011) · High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14025-9_1 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, S., & Yeung, E. S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2373-2385
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2029309140
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.