The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Stimulatory Drugs of Abuse in Wastewater and Surface Waters
Abstract
Ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry was used for the rapid and simultaneous analysis of 15 stimulatory drugs in water. Cocaine, amphetamine-related compounds, LSD, ketamine, PCP, fentanyl, and metabolites, among the controlled drugs, and nicotine, caffeine, and their metabolites, among the noncontrolled drugs, were studied. Chromatographic separation was achieved in less than 4.5 min, with improved peak resolution and sensitivity. Identification and quantification of the compounds of interest was performed by selected reaction monitoring, using an electrospray ionization source. Isotope dilution (except for paraxanthine) was used for quantitation. Quality parameters of the method were established, and limits of quantification were obtained for controlled drugs in surface waters from 0.1 to 3.1 ng/L and in wastewaters from 0.2 to 4.0 ng/L. Run-to-run and day-to-day precisions were evaluated in different water matrixes (Milli-Q water, surface water, wastewater). To assess the presence of these drugs in real water samples, the optimized method was applied to the analysis of wastewater and surface river water. The analysis of several samples from wastewater treatment plants in northeast Spain revealed the presence of drugs such as cocaine and amphetamine-related compounds, in both influent and effluent samples. Cocaine metabolite and MDMA (ecstasy) were also found in surface waters while nicotine and caffeine were detected in all the analyzed samples. The results obtained demonstrate that the presence of these drugs in the aquatic media must be considered a matter of environmental concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fatta-Kassinos, D., Meric, S., & Nikolaou, A. (2011) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4300-9 · Cited by 938
Estimating Community Drug Abuse by Wastewater Analysis
Zuccato, E., Chiabrando, C., Castiglioni, S., Bagnati, R., & Fanelli, R. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11022 · Cited by 623
Wastewater-based epidemiology biomarkers: Past, present and future
Choi, P. M., Tscharke, B. J., Donner, E., O'Brien, J. W., Grant, S. C., Kaserzon, S. L., Mackie, R., O'Malley, E., Crosbie, N. D., Thomas, K. V., et al. (2018) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.004 · Cited by 486
Illicit drugs and the environment — A review
Pal, R., Megharaj, M., Kirkbride, K. P., & Naidu, R. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.086 · Cited by 288
Occurrence of Organic Microcontaminants in the Wastewater Treatment Process. A Mini Review
Ratola, N., Cincinelli, A., Alves, A., & Katsoyiannis, A. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.040 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Huerta-Fontela, M., Galceran, M. T., & Ventura, F.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-04-17
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3821-3829
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1969576166
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Stimulatory Drugs of Abuse in Wastewater and Surface Waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac062370x
- The paper
- Huerta-Fontela, M., Galceran, M. T., & Ventura, F. (2007). Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Stimulatory Drugs of Abuse in Wastewater and Surface Waters. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac062370x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.