Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Watching Silica Nanoparticles Glow in the Biological World

Open access
Wang, Lin, Wang, Kemin, Santra, Swadeshmukul, Zhao, Xiaojun, Hilliard, Lisa R., Smith, Joshua E., Wu, Yanrong, Tan, Weihong·2006·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Because of their brightness, photostability, and other advantages, dye-doped silica nanoparticles show great promise. Weihong Tan and colleagues at the Universities of Florida, Central Florida, and North Dakota and Hunan University (China) discuss preparation methods, practical features, and a variety of biological applications. © 2006 American Chemical Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac0693619

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Wang, K., Santra, S., Zhao, X., Hilliard, L. R., Smith, J. E., Wu, Y., & Tan, W.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
646-654
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2063079745
Cited by
347
References
0
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Watching Silica Nanoparticles Glow in the Biological World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0693619
The paper
Wang, L., Wang, K., Santra, S., Zhao, X., Hilliard, L. R., Smith, J. E., Wu, Y., & Tan, W. (2006). Watching Silica Nanoparticles Glow in the Biological World. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0693619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.