The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utilizing Ion-Pairing Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Solid Phase Extraction for Efficient Glycopeptide Enrichment in Glycoproteomics
Abstract
Glycopeptide enrichment is a prerequisite to enable structural characterization of protein glycosylation in glycoproteomics. Here we present an improved method for glycopeptide enrichment based on zwitter-ionic hydrophilic interaction chromatography solid phase extraction (ZIC-HILIC SPE) in a microcolumn format. The method involves TFA ion pairing (IP) to increase the hydrophilicity difference between glycopeptides and nonglycosylated peptides. Three mobile phases were investigated, i.e., 2% formic acid (defined as IP(2% FA) ZIC-HILIC SPE), 0.1% TFA and 1% TFA (defined as IP(0.1% TFA) and IP(1% TFA) ZIC-HILIC SPE) all containing 80% acetonitrile. Samples of increasing complexities, i.e., digests of single glycoproteins, a five-glycoprotein mixture, and depleted plasma, were used in the study. The presence of TFA in the mobile phase significantly improved the glycopeptide enrichment for all complexities, as evaluated by enhanced glycopeptide detection using MALDI-TOF MS and RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS, e.g., the glycopeptide ion signals were increased by up to 3.7-fold compared to IP(2% FA) conditions. The enhanced glycopeptide detection was promoted by a substantial depletion of nonglycosylated peptides, offering an almost complete isolation of IgG glycopeptides using a single SPE enrichment step and a reduction from 711 nonglycosylated peptides observed in the IP(2% FA) ZIC-HILIC SPE retained plasma fraction, to only 157 and 97 when 0.1% and 1% TFA was used in the mobile phase. In conclusion, this systematic study has shown that TFA-containing mobile phases increase glycopeptide enrichment efficiency considerably for a broad range of sample complexities when using ZIC-HILIC SPE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of Glycosylation in Development
Haltiwanger, R. S., & Lowe, J. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074043 · Cited by 757
Cited by
Mass spectrometry approaches to glycomic and glycoproteomic analyses
Ruhaak, L. R., Xu, G., Li, Q., Goonatilleke, E., & Lebrilla, C. B. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00732 · Cited by 395
High-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Glycoproteomics: A Balance between High-Throughput and In-Depth Analysis
Yang, Y., Franc, V., & Heck, A. J. R. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.010 · Cited by 122
SUGAR-seq enables simultaneous detection of glycans, epitopes, and the transcriptome in single cells
Kearney, C. J., Vervoort, S. J., Ramsbottom, K. M., Todorovski, I., Lelliott, E. J., Zethoven, M., Pijpers, L., Martin, B. P., Semple, T., Martelotto, L., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe3610 · Cited by 87
Kammeijer, G. S. M., Kohler, I., Jansen, B. C., Hensbergen, P. J., Mayboroda, O. A., Falck, D., & Wuhrer, M. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00479 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Mysling, S., Palmisano, G., Højrup, P., & Thaysen-Andersen, M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-06-10
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5598-5609
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2064347820
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilizing Ion-Pairing Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Solid Phase Extraction for Efficient Glycopeptide Enrichment in Glycoproteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac100530w
- The paper
- Mysling, S., Palmisano, G., Højrup, P., & Thaysen-Andersen, M. (2010). Utilizing Ion-Pairing Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Solid Phase Extraction for Efficient Glycopeptide Enrichment in Glycoproteomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100530w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.