The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of the Potential Pancreatic Cancer Marker MUC4 in Serum Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
Open accessAbstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. It has a 5-year survival rate of only 6%, owing in part to the lack of a reliable tumor marker for early diagnosis. Recent research has shown that the mucin protein MUC4 is aberrantly expressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines and tissues but is undetectable in normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. Thus, the level of MUC4 in patient sera has the potential to function as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for PC. However, the measurement of MUC4 in sera using conventional test platforms (e.g., enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA)) has been unsuccessful. This has prevented the assessment of the utility of this protein as a possible PC marker in sera. In addressing this obstacle, the work herein examines the potential to create a simple diagnostic test for MUC4 through the development of a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based immunoassay, which was then used to demonstrate the first ever detection of MUC4 in cancer patient serum samples. Importantly, these measurements showed that sera from patients with PC produced a significantly higher SERS response for MUC4 compared to sera from healthy individuals and from patients with benign diseases. These results indicate that a SERS-based immunoassay can monitor MUC4 levels in patient sera, representing a much needed first step toward assessing the potential of this protein to serve as a serum marker for the early stage diagnosis of PC. This paper details these and other findings (i.e., the detection of the mucin protein CA19-9), which demonstrate that our SERS assay outperforms conventional assays (i.e., RIA and ELISA) with respect to limits of detection, readout time, and required sample volume.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596
Cited by
A Review on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
Pilot, R., Signorini, R., Durante, C., Orian, L., Bhamidipati, M., & Fabris, L. (2019) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios9020057 · Cited by 1,010
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): progress and trends
Cialla, D., März, A., Böhme, R., Theil, F., Weber, K., Schmitt, M., & Popp, J. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-011-5631-x · Cited by 931
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering in cancer detection and imaging
Vendrell, M., Maiti, K. K., Dhaliwal, K., & Chang, Y.-T. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.013 · Cited by 375
Multiplex in vitro detection using SERS
Laing, S., Gracie, K., & Faulds, K. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00644a · Cited by 361
Emerging advances in nanomedicine with engineered gold nanostructures
Webb, J. A., & Bardhan, R. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c3nr05112a · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G., Lipert, R. J., Jain, M., Kaur, S., Chakraboty, S., Torres, M. P., Batra, S. K., Brand, R. E., & Porter, M. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2554-2561
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1965554123
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of the Potential Pancreatic Cancer Marker MUC4 in Serum Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac102829b
- The paper
- Wang, G., Lipert, R. J., Jain, M., Kaur, S., Chakraboty, S., Torres, M. P., Batra, S. K., Brand, R. E., & Porter, M. D. (2011). Detection of the Potential Pancreatic Cancer Marker MUC4 in Serum Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102829b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.