The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aptamer-Enabled Efficient Isolation of Cancer Cells from Whole Blood Using a Microfluidic Device
Open accessAbstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the peripheral blood could provide important information for diagnosis of cancer metastasis and monitoring treatment progress. However, CTC are extremely rare in the bloodstream, making their detection and characterization technically challenging. We report here the development of an aptamer-mediated, micropillar-based microfluidic device that is able to efficiently isolate tumor cells from unprocessed whole blood. High-affinity aptamers were used as an alternative to antibodies for cancer cell isolation. The microscope-slide-sized device consists of >59,000 micropillars, which enhanced the probability of the interactions between aptamers and target cancer cells. The device geometry and the flow rate were investigated and optimized by studying their effects on the isolation of target leukemia cells from a cell mixture. The device yielded a capture efficiency of ~95% with purity of ~81% at the optimum flow rate of 600 nL/s. Further, we exploited the device for isolating colorectal tumor cells from unprocessed whole blood; as few as 10 tumor cells were captured from 1 mL of whole blood. We also addressed the question of low throughput of a typical microfluidic device by processing 1 mL of blood within 28 min. In addition, we found that ~93% of the captured cells were viable, making them suitable for subsequent molecular and cellular studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited
Fidler, I. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1098 · Cited by 4,686
Cited by
Fundamentals and applications of inertial microfluidics: a review
Zhang, J., Yan, S., Yuan, D., Alici, G., Nguyen, N.-T., Ebrahimi Warkiani, M., & Li, W. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c5lc01159k · Cited by 1,017
Aptamer-based targeted therapy
Zhu, G., & Chen, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.005 · Cited by 522
Biosensor technology: recent advances in threat agent detection and medicine
Kirsch, J., Siltanen, C., Zhou, Q., Revzin, A., & Simonian, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60141b · Cited by 462
Micro/nanofluidic technologies for efficient isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells
Yue, W.-Q., Tan, Z., Li, X.-P., Liu, F.-F., & Wang, C. (2019) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.009 · Cited by 34
Microfluidic systems for modeling digestive cancer: a review of recent progress
Razavi, Z., Soltani, M., Pazoki-Toroudi, H., & Dabagh, M. (2024) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad6f15 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheng, W., Chen, T., Kamath, R., Xiong, X., Tan, W., & Fan, Z. H.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-17
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4199-4206
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1969894206
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aptamer-Enabled Efficient Isolation of Cancer Cells from Whole Blood Using a Microfluidic Device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac3005633
- The paper
- Sheng, W., Chen, T., Kamath, R., Xiong, X., Tan, W., & Fan, Z. H. (2012). Aptamer-Enabled Efficient Isolation of Cancer Cells from Whole Blood Using a Microfluidic Device. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3005633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.