The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A 3D Printed Fluidic Device that Enables Integrated Features
Open accessAbstract
Fluidic devices fabricated using conventional soft lithography are well suited as prototyping methods. Three-dimensional (3D) printing, commonly used for producing design prototypes in industry, allows for one step production of devices. 3D printers build a device layer by layer based on 3D computer models. Here, a reusable, high throughput, 3D printed fluidic device was created that enables flow and incorporates a membrane above a channel in order to study drug transport and affect cells. The device contains 8 parallel channels, 3 mm wide by 1.5 mm deep, connected to a syringe pump through standard, threaded fittings. The device was also printed to allow integration with commercially available membrane inserts whose bottoms are constructed of a porous polycarbonate membrane; this insert enables molecular transport to occur from the channel to above the well. When concentrations of various antibiotics (levofloxacin and linezolid) are pumped through the channels, approximately 18-21% of the drug migrates through the porous membrane, providing evidence that this device will be useful for studies where drug effects on cells are investigated. Finally, we show that mammalian cells cultured on this membrane can be affected by reagents flowing through the channels. Specifically, saponin was used to compromise cell membranes, and a fluorescent label was used to monitor the extent, resulting in a 4-fold increase in fluorescence for saponin treated cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationThe upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics
Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S., & Folch, A. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00163g · Cited by 1,123
3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers
Waheed, S., Cabot, J. M., Macdonald, N. P., Lewis, T., Guijt, R. M., Paull, B., & Breadmore, M. C. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00284f · Cited by 1,039
Lee, H., & Cho, D.-W. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00450d · Cited by 363
3D printing for chemical, pharmaceutical and biological applications
Capel, A. J., Rimington, R. P., Lewis, M. P., & Christie, S. D. R. (2018) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0058-y · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, K. B., Lockwood, S. Y., Martin, R. S., & Spence, D. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-29
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5622-5626
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2333236013
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 3D Printed Fluidic Device that Enables Integrated Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac4009594
- The paper
- Anderson, K. B., Lockwood, S. Y., Martin, R. S., & Spence, D. M. (2013). A 3D Printed Fluidic Device that Enables Integrated Features. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4009594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.